Back to research feed

Seminars in radiation oncology

August 24, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Resilience to Disaster: System Design and Future Directions.

Ford E.

ReviewAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Mapping disaster preparedness onto the Donabedian structure-process-outcome model provides a principled framework for building resilience in radiation oncology services.

What was studied

Conceptual review proposing a disaster preparedness framework for radiation oncology, drawing on examples from humanitarian surgery and pandemic responses.

Key findings

  • Radiation oncology is especially vulnerable given dependence on complex equipment and digital infrastructure
  • Prior disaster responses map coherently onto structure, process and outcome domains
  • Reviews professional and accreditation guidance and future directions such as formal risk assessment

Clinical relevance

This framework may help departments plan for disruptions such as cyberattacks or natural disasters.

Who should care

Radiation Oncology

Limitations

Conceptual framework without empirical evaluation.

Radiation oncology departments should plan structurally for disasters before they happen.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Rapid-onset disasters pose a particular challenge to oncology services, especially radiation oncology, which is highly technical and dependent on complex equipment and digital infrastructure. Thoughtful preparation can anticipate vulnerabilities and improve disaster response; however, recommendations are still emerging and individual clinics are largely left to develop and activate their own disaster preparedness plans. A principled conceptual framework for system design is therefore needed. In this article, we discuss such a framework, mapping disaster preparedness considerations onto the widely-used Donabedian model of healthcare quality, which evaluates care across 3 interdependent domains: Structure, Process, and Outcome. We draw on examples from outside oncology-including humanitarian surgical programs and institutional pandemic responses-that have applied this model at the clinical and operational level. We demonstrate that previously reported experience of disaster response in radiation oncology maps coherently onto this framework, and we present specific design principles and practical approaches that organizations can employ. Current guidance from professional societies and accreditation bodies is reviewed, and future directions-including formal risk assessment and commercial disaster-recovery solutions-are discussed. When thoughtfully applied, these principles of system design can help oncology programs build meaningful resilience before the next disaster arrives.

DOI

10.1016/j.semradonc.2026.151055

PMID

42636676

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in