Back to research feed

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology

September 19, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Impact of accumulated target dose on tumor response in distal esophageal cancer treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy.

van Keeken K, Badiu V, Vilches-Freixas G, +6 more, Berbée M

Journal ArticleAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

In distal esophageal cancer treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy, ITV underdosage was common but GTV coverage was preserved and tumor response and survival were unaffected.

What was studied

Retrospective study of 135 patients with distal esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with IMPT (2020-2024), assessing weekly accumulated dose on repeat CTs.

Key findings

  • ITV underdosage in 21% of patients; no GTV underdosage
  • Post-treatment cCR rates did not differ by ITV underdosage (p=0.90)
  • Complete tumor response 28% vs 30% with and without ITV underdosage
  • Diaphragm amplitude >2 cm not associated with underdosage
  • 2-year OS 64% in both groups

Clinical relevance

This suggests that larger diaphragm motion alone may not need to exclude patients from IMPT for distal esophageal cancer, though the data are retrospective.

Who should care

Radiation OncologyMedical OncologyGynaecological OncologySurgical Oncology

Limitations

Retrospective, single-cohort analysis of modest size; the methods description of the dose criterion is truncated in the abstract.

Proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer seems robust to respiratory motion in terms of tumor response.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In esophageal cancer, respiratory motion and anatomical changes can compromise dose delivery during proton radiotherapy. Adequate internal target volume (ITV) coverage does not necessarily ensure sufficient gross tumor volume (GTV) dose, particularly for distal tumors near the diaphragm. This study evaluated whether deviations in accumulated target dose affect tumor response.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 135 patients with distal esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) between 2020 and 2024. Accumulated ITV dose was assessed weekly on repeat CTs using a robust voxel-wise minimum dose criterion (ITV D98 % < 94 %). Cumulative dose deposition was estimated using robust dose accumulation. Primary endpoints were persistent clinical complete response (cCR) at 12 months and pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included post-treatment cCR and two-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median baseline diaphragm amplitude was 1.6 cm (range 0.5-8.7 cm). ITV underdosage occurred in 21 % of patients. No cases of GTV underdosage were observed. Post-treatment cCR rates did not differ between patients with and without ITV underdosage (p = 0.90). Complete tumor response, defined as persistent cCR at 12 months or pCR, was observed in 28 % and 30 % of patients with and without ITV underdosage, respectively. Baseline diaphragm amplitude > 2 cm was not associated with target underdosage, and two-year OS was similar between groups (64 % vs. 64 %, p = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite frequent ITV underdosage, GTV coverage remained preserved and no association with tumor response or OS was observed. Baseline diaphragm amplitude alone does not appear to warrant exclusion from treatment with IMPT.

DOI

10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111788

PMID

42763050

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in