The Journal of hospital infection
September 2, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Real-world implementation and impact of interventional antimicrobial stewardship programmes in Asian hospital settings: an updated systematic review mapped to IDSA/SHEA recommendations, the WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, and AWaRe antibiotic categories.
Zhang H, Zhou B, Lee YF, Wang J
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
A systematic review of 32 Asian hospital stewardship studies found consistent reductions in antibiotic use and cost, inconsistent resistance reporting, and generally unchanged mortality.
What was studied
MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched for adult inpatient interventional antimicrobial stewardship studies in Southeast and East Asia published between June 2016 and March 2026, reporting antibiotic consumption, resistance incidence, mortality, or costs. Interventions and outcomes were mapped to IDSA/SHEA recommendations, WHO AWaRe categories, and the WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, with quality assessed by EPOC and ICROMS criteria and descriptive synthesis due to heterogeneity.
Key findings
- 32 studies included; 29 (90.6%) single-centre, 22 (68.8%) from China and 6 (18.8%) from Singapore
- Most common mapped intervention components: preauthorisation and/or prospective audit and feedback (22 studies), education (18), shortest effective duration (13), facility-specific guidelines (9), computerised decision support (8)
- Antibiotic-use and cost outcomes were consistently favourable
- AWaRe-classifiable reductions concentrated in Watch and selected Reserve antibiotics
- Resistance outcomes were inconsistently reported but included reductions in selected WHO critical- and high-priority phenotypes
- Mortality was generally unchanged
- Identified gaps: diagnostic stewardship, special populations, and standardised outcome reporting
Clinical relevance
Given that the evidence base is dominated by single-centre before-after studies from two countries, this review supports stewardship as safe and consumption-reducing in Asian hospitals while cautioning that resistance and mortality effects remain unproven.
Who should care
Limitations
Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, publication and design bias are likely in largely uncontrolled before-after studies, and geographic concentration limits generalisability across Asia.
Hospital stewardship in Asia reliably cuts antibiotic use and cost without harming mortality, but its effect on resistance is still poorly measured.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) are central to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) control, but regional evidence from Asian hospitals remains heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to update evidence on inpatient interventional ASP/antimicrobial stewardship programme (AMS) studies in Southeast and East Asia and to map intervention components, antibiotic-use outcomes, and resistance outcomes to Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) recommendations, World Health Organization Access, Watch, and Reserve (WHO AWaRe) categories, and the WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List. MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was searched for studies published from 20June 2016 to 22March 2026. Eligible studies were adult inpatient interventional ASP/AMS studies reporting antibiotic consumption, AMR incidence, mortality, or costs/expenditures. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed quality or risk of bias. Controlled and interrupted time-series designs were assessed using Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care criteria; non-controlled before-after studies were assessed using Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs--. Synthesis was descriptive because of heterogeneity. Thirty-two studies were included. Most were single-centre (29/32, 90.6%) and conducted in China (22/32, 68.8%) or Singapore (6/32, 18.8%). Preauthorization and/or prospective audit and feedback was the most commonly mapped IDSA/SHEA component (22 studies), followed by education (18 studies), shortest effective duration (13 studies), facility-specific guidelines (9 studies), and computerized clinical decision support (8 studies). Antibiotic-use and cost outcomes were consistently favourable, with AWaRe-classifiable reductions concentrated in Watch- and selected Reserve-category antibiotics. Resistance outcomes were less consistently reported but included reductions in selected WHO critical- and high-priority phenotypes; mortality was generally unchanged. ASPs in Southeast and East Asia are increasingly multi-faceted. This combined implementation and public-health mapping identifies progress and highlights gaps in diagnostic stewardship, special populations, and standardized outcome reporting.
DOI
10.1016/j.jhin.2026.08.021
PMID
42685915
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed