Back to research feed

Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology

August 13, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Consolidative Radiotherapy After Gemcitabine-Platinum Chemotherapy in De Novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Impact of Chemotherapy Backbone and Prognostic Factors on Survival.

Wan JLY, Chow JCH

Journal ArticleAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

High-dose locoregional radiotherapy after gemcitabine-platinum in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma was feasible but gave modest PFS (6.8 months), with worse outcomes using carboplatin instead of cisplatin.

What was studied

A retrospective two-center Hong Kong study of 66 de novo metastatic NPC patients who received gemcitabine-platinum followed by locoregional RT of 60 Gy or more (2014-2024).

Key findings

  • LRRT completion 93.9%; grade 3 dermatitis 18.2% and mucositis 7.6%; 2 treatment-related deaths
  • Median PFS 6.8 months and OS 22.3 months; distant progression predominated (71.2%)
  • Liver metastasis and gemcitabine-carboplatin predicted poorer PFS
  • Gemcitabine-carboplatin and more than one metastatic lesion predicted poorer OS

Clinical relevance

This supports preferring gemcitabine-cisplatin and reserving LRRT for carefully selected low-burden patients in the chemo-immunotherapy era. The data are retrospective and pre-date routine immunotherapy.

Who should care

Medical Oncology

Limitations

Retrospective with modest sample; no immunotherapy; selection bias in platinum choice.

In metastatic NPC, cisplatin beats carboplatin, and consolidative RT is best kept for low-burden disease.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

De novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has a poor prognosis despite modern chemotherapy. Gemcitabine-cisplatin is the standard chemotherapy backbone, whereas carboplatin is commonly used as a cisplatin alternative for its better tolerability. This study evaluated high-dose locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT) after standardized gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy and identified prognostic factors for patient selection.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with de novo metastatic NPC treated at two Hong Kong tertiary centers (2014-2024) with first-line gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy followed by high-dose LRRT (≥60 Gy). Baseline characteristics, treatment details, toxicities, and outcomes were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were evaluated with log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included (median age 58 years; 83.3% male). At diagnosis, 27.3% had liver metastases and 83.8% had >1 metastatic lesion. Most (81.8%) completed six chemotherapy cycles (56.1% gemcitabine-cisplatin; 42.4% gemcitabine-carboplatin). LRRT completion rate was 93.9%. The rates of grade 3 dermatitis and mucositis were 18.2% and 7.6%. Two treatment-related deaths were recorded. At a median follow-up of 42 months, median PFS and OS were 6.8 and 22.3 months, respectively; distant progression was the predominant failure pattern (71.2%). On multivariable analysis, liver metastasis and gemcitabine-carboplatin use independently predicted poorer PFS, while gemcitabine-carboplatin and >1 metastatic lesion portended poorer OS.

CONCLUSION

High-dose LRRT after gemcitabine-platinum was feasible with acceptable toxicity but yielded modest PFS in an unselected population of de novo metastatic NPC, with outcomes strongly influenced by metastatic burden, liver involvement, and platinum choice. Gemcitabine-cisplatin remains the preferred chemotherapy backbone, and LRRT may be best reserved for carefully selected patients in the contemporary chemo-immunotherapy era.

DOI

10.1111/ajco.70159

PMID

42595962

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in