Back to research feed

Reproductive biomedicine online

May 12, 2026 · via Europe PMC

From the shadow of pregnancy loss to a new pregnancy: couples' perspectives and medical care priorities.

Koert E, Mackel R, Hartwig TS, Schmidt L, Nielsen HS.

Journal ArticleAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Interviews with 20 Danish couples after recent pregnancy loss show they navigate toward a new pregnancy with fluid emotional readiness and cautious optimism, and want individualized follow-up rather than being told to 'just try again'.

What was studied

A qualitative study of joint semi-structured interviews with 20 couples from the Copenhagen Pregnancy Loss Research Programme, 1-12 weeks after one or two losses, analysed with reflexive thematic analysis.

Key findings

  • Overarching theme: stepping out of the shadow of loss toward a new pregnancy
  • Focusing on a new pregnancy as a way to cope and heal
  • Emotional readiness seen as fluid and never fully attainable
  • Cautious optimism alongside conflicting emotions
  • Couples valued empathetic, individualized discussion of future pregnancy at follow-up

Clinical relevance

The findings support follow-up care after pregnancy loss that integrates emotional readiness with reproductive planning in a family-centred way.

Who should care

Reproductive Medicine & Surgery

Limitations

Small qualitative sample from a single Danish programme, interviewed soon after loss, limiting generalizability.

Couples after pregnancy loss want compassionate, tailored conversations about trying again.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Research question

What are couples' perspectives on a new pregnancy after a recent pregnancy loss, and what do they need from medical care?

Design

Qualitative interview study of 20 couples recruited from the Copenhagen Pregnancy Loss (COPL) Research Programme (a prospective study of over 3000 couples in Denmark seeking acute care for pregnancy loss before 22 weeks of gestation). Couples who had experienced one or two pregnancy losses participated in joint semi-structured interviews 1-12 weeks after the loss (median 3 weeks). Data were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's approach. Researcher reflexivity and iterative discussions enhanced analytic credibility and transparency.

Results

An overarching theme was developed from the data: 'stepping out of the shadow of pregnancy loss towards a new pregnancy'; this described couples' efforts to move forwards while navigating emotional uncertainty. Four themes captured their experiences: (i) 'focusing on a new pregnancy as a way to cope with and heal from loss'; (ii) 'recognizing that emotional readiness is fluid and never fully attainable'; (iii) 'approaching a new pregnancy with cautious optimism while managing co-existing, conflicting emotions'; and (iv) 'seeking medical care and support to plan and prepare for a future pregnancy'. Couples valued empathetic, individualized discussions about future pregnancy during follow-up, rather than being told they can 'just try again' at the time of pregnancy loss.

Conclusions

This study offers insight into how couples navigate the transition from pregnancy loss to planning another pregnancy. Findings highlight the need for follow-up care integrating emotional readiness with reproductive planning, delivered through compassionate family-centred care to improve trust, continuity and patient experience.

DOI

10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105769

PMID

42302669

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in