Back to research feed

American journal of nephrology

April 15, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Dialysis.

Elenjickal EJ, Mavrakanas TA.

ReviewOpen access

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Large trials (ALCHEMIST and ACHIEVE) show spironolactone provides no cardiovascular or survival benefit in maintenance dialysis and increases hyperkalemia and endocrine adverse effects.

What was studied

A narrative review of the biological rationale and clinical trial evidence for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in dialysis.

Key findings

  • Spironolactone and eplerenone are protein-bound, hepatically metabolized, and not dialyzable
  • ALCHEMIST (n=644): MACE HR 1.00 (0.73-1.36)
  • ACHIEVE (n=2,538): CV death or HF hospitalization HR 0.92 (0.78-1.09), with more hyperkalemia
  • Meta-analysis: neutral efficacy, more hyperkalemia and gynecomastia

Clinical relevance

This review indicates current evidence does not support routine steroidal MRA use for cardiovascular protection in dialysis patients; nonsteroidal MRAs remain untested in this setting.

Who should care

Nephrology

Limitations

Narrative review; evidence base is limited to steroidal MRAs.

Spironolactone does not prevent cardiovascular events in dialysis patients and raises potassium.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Background

Aldosterone regulates genes controlling fluid and electrolyte balance through mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation. Sustained MR activation promotes inflammation, fibrosis, sodium retention, and myocardial remodeling. MR antagonists (MRAs) block aldosterone binding in the kidney, heart, and vasculature and are classified as steroidal or nonsteroidal. Although large, randomized trials have confirmed the benefits of steroidal MRAs in heart failure and of finerenone in diabetic kidney disease, these pivotal studies systematically excluded patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis. Over the past decade, several phase 2 and 3 trials have evaluated MRAs in dialysis, yielding heterogeneous and sometimes conflicting results. This review summarizes the biological rationale, evolving clinical evidence, and future directions for MR blockade in dialysis.

Summary

Pharmacokinetic studies indicate that spironolactone and eplerenone are highly protein-bound, hepatically metabolized, and not dialyzable, supporting cautious use in dialysis with potassium monitoring. Early randomized trials from East Asia suggested potential cardiovascular benefit with spironolactone 25 mg daily; however, these studies were underpowered and reported relatively few outcome events. More definitive evidence is now available from two large multicenter randomized controlled trials. In ALCHEMIST (n = 644), spironolactone 25 mg daily did not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared with placebo over a median follow-up of 2.7 years [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.36]. Similarly, in ACHIEVE (n = 2,538), spironolactone failed to reduce the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.78-1.09) over 1.8 years and was associated with higher rates of hyperkalemia. A contemporary meta-analysis incorporating these trials confirmed neutral efficacy but higher rates of asymptomatic hyperkalemia and gynecomastia.

Key messages

Current evidence indicates that steroidal MRAs confer no cardiovascular or survival benefit in maintenance dialysis and modestly increase the risk of hyperkalemia and endocrine adverse effects.

DOI

10.1159/000551881

PMID

41984736

PMCID

PMC13309082

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in