Back to research feed

Journal of orthopaedic trauma

September 1, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Adverse Mental Health Outcomes After Modern External Ring Fixation Versus Internal Fixation for Severe Open Tibia Fractures: A Secondary Analysis of the FIXIT Study.

Simske NM, Solarczyk JK, Thompson AR, +9 more, METRC.

Randomized Controlled TrialAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

A third of patients had moderate to severe depression one year after severe open tibia fractures, regardless of ring versus internal fixation.

What was studied

A secondary analysis of the multicenter FIXIT RCT of 254 patients with severe open tibial shaft fractures treated with external ring fixation or internal fixation.

Key findings

  • 34% had moderate to severe depression at 12 months
  • Female sex (RR 1.70), high school education or less (RR 1.93), and baseline mental health conditions (RR 1.91) were risk factors
  • Mental health and pain outcomes did not differ by fixation method

Clinical relevance

Highlights the need to address mental health after severe open tibia fractures; fixation choice did not appear to influence these outcomes.

Who should care

Orthopaedics

Limitations

Secondary analysis not powered specifically for mental health outcomes.

Depression and pain are common after severe open tibia fractures, whatever fixation is used.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Objectives

To report the prevalence of adverse mental health outcomes 1 year after severe open tibial shaft fractures and their association with treatment and complication risk factors.

Methods

.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Multicenter.

Patient selection criteria

Eligible patients were 18-64 years of age with severe open tibial shaft fractures (AO/OTA 41-43) treated with modern external ring fixation or internal fixation. All Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB fractures were included and some type IIIA meeting specific severity criteria.

Outcome measures and comparisons

Outcome measures included Patient Health Questionnaire scores for depression symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-IV (PCL-S), and the Brief Pain Inventory. Primary comparisons assessed depression, PTSD, and pain between treatment groups (modern external ring fixation vs. internal fixation).

Results

A total of 254 patients were treated with external ring fixation (n = 121) or internal fixation (n = 133). The mean age was 39 years (SD = 13) and 16% were female. At 12 months after injury, 34% of patients had Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores consistent with moderate to severe depression. Risk factors for depression were female sex (RR: 1.70 [1.01-2.86]), high school educational attainment or less (RR: 1.93 [1.27-3.04]), and any baseline mental health condition (RR: 1.91 [1.22-2.99]), all P < 0.05. At 12 months, 45% of patients met criteria for PTSD. Any baseline mental health condition was a risk factor for developing PTSD (RR: 2.07 [1.50-2.88]), P < 0.001. Protective factors against the development of depression and PTSD included higher self-efficacy at 6 weeks after injury and any major limb complication (eg, infection) within 12 months, both P < 0.01. Moderate to severe daily pain interference was reported by 49% of participants at 12 months and was associated with high school-level education attainment or less (RR: 1.41 [1.03-1.94]) and was mitigated by self-efficacy at 6 weeks postinjury (RR: 0.53 [0.38-0.74]), both P < 0.05. Fixation modality (external ring fixation vs. internal fixation) was not associated with depression (RR: 0.82 [0.83-1.27], P = 0.37), PTSD (RR: 1.06 [0.77-1.48], P = 0.71), pain intensity (RR: 0.98 [0.63-1.51], P = 0.92), or pain interference (0.96 [0.70-1.33], P = 0.83).

Conclusions

Mental health sequelae and moderate to severe pain were common 1 year after sustaining a severe open tibial shaft fracture. Adverse mental health outcomes and pain were not influenced by fixation modality (external ring fixation vs. internal fixation).

Level of evidence

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

DOI

10.1097/bot.0000000000003203

PMID

42047505

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in