Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
June 22, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Lawyers in the burns unit - a review of pro bono legal services provided for patients with burn injury.
Sullivan JV, Rogers B, Smith KM, +6 more, Shelley OP.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
A review of a UK burns center's pro bono legal service found that over 7 years it advised on 108 patient cases, mostly for welfare and financial matters, and recovered more than £3.7 million in compensation across 6 settled cases.
What was studied
A retrospective review of a pro bono legal service provided to patients at a UK regional burns center (October 2012-October 2019), describing the scope, volume, and outcomes of legal advice and assistance provided to burn patients and their relatives regarding personal, financial, and compensation matters.
Key findings
- The service advised on 108 patient cases over the review period and provided more than 2,100 hours of solicitors' time, with 777 hours spent on non-compensation advice regarding welfare benefits and insurance.
- Potential third-party compensation claims were identified in 83 cases, but the law firm was instructed to pursue recourse in only 16 of these.
- Of the 16 cases pursued for compensation, 6 settled, recovering a total of over £3.7 million.
Clinical relevance
This descriptive service review may be relevant to burn centers and healthcare administrators considering integrating legal support services, suggesting potential benefit to patients and significant financial recovery, which the authors note could also benefit government/NHS finances when claims succeed.
Who should care
Limitations
This is a descriptive, single-center service review without a comparison group (e.g., patients without access to such services), so it cannot establish the counterfactual benefit (what would have happened without the service) or whether these findings generalize to other healthcare systems.
A pro bono legal service at a UK burns center assisted over 100 patients with welfare and compensation matters, recovering over £3.7 million in settled claims over 7 years.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Objectives
We present a review of a pro bono legal service provided to patients treated at a regional burns centre in the United Kingdom for the period between October 2012 and October 2019.
Data sources
A solicitor, supported by a paralegal, was available to give pro bono advice to any patient attending the burns service. The legal team provided assistance to patients and their relatives with advice pertaining to their personal and financial affairs as impacted by the injury. This was provided independently from, but in addition to, existing support from the hospital legal and ethical departments.
Data selection
The pro bono legal service has advised on 108 patient cases since this service began in October 2012 and has provided more than 2100 h of solicitors' time.
Data extraction
777 h were spent on non-compensation advice given on welfare benefits and insurance.
Data synthesis
Advice on welfare and/or financial matters was requested by all patients, and although potential claims for compensation against a third party were found in 83 cases, of these, the law firm operating the legal service was known to have been instructed to pursue recourse in only 16 cases. However, of the 16 cases instructed to make a compensation claim so far, 6 cases have settled, recovering a total of over £ 3.7 million.
Conclusion
This review shows a likely benefit to patients from pro bono legal advice available in a burns unit setting. It also showed the significant financial gain to the government and potentially the NHS when a compensation claim was made by a patient.
DOI
10.1016/j.burns.2026.108117
PMID
42520420
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed