Back to research feed

Pediatric blood & cancer

July 31, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Health-Related Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Pediatric Patients Receiving CAR T-Cell Therapy: A Prospective, Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcomes Study.

Steineck A, Zhang L, Pan AY, +6 more, Levine D.

Multicenter StudyAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Children and young adults receiving CAR T-cell therapy reported their worst quality of life before infusion, with improvement afterward and modest, time-limited symptom burden.

What was studied

Prospective longitudinal multicenter study of 59 patients aged 8-25 receiving CAR T-cell therapy for any malignancy at three US pediatric centers, with serial PedsQL and MSAS assessments through 12 months.

Key findings

  • 41% treated for ALL; median age 17
  • Scores worst at baseline (PedsQL Generic 64.9, PedsQL Cancer 70.0, MSAS 24.4) and improved post-infusion
  • Largest gains by 4 weeks in physical functioning (+8) and worry (+20)
  • Most burdensome symptoms: fatigue, worry, pain, nervousness and anorexia
  • Strong negative correlation between symptom burden and HRQOL (r=-0.81); p-value not fully captured in the abstract

Clinical relevance

This supports the feasibility of serial patient-reported outcome collection during pediatric CAR T therapy to guide supportive care, though the sample is modest.

Who should care

Pediatric Oncology

Limitations

Modest sample size with most assessments in the first month; heterogeneous diagnoses.

Quality of life tends to improve after pediatric CAR T-cell infusion, and tracking symptoms can guide supportive care.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Background

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has expanded rapidly as an investigational treatment for advanced cancers. Studies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) suggest health-related quality of life (HRQOL) may improve by 1-month post-infusion. However, patient-reported outcomes remain insufficiently characterized, particularly across the broader pediatric CAR T-cell population.

Procedure

English- or Spanish-speaking patients (ages 8-25 years) receiving CAR T-cell therapy for any malignancy were recruited from three US pediatric cancer centers. Patient-reported HRQOL (PedsQL) and symptom burden (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale [MSAS]) were assessed serially through 12 months post-infusion, emphasizing the first month. Linear mixed models characterized score trajectories and examined associations between symptom burden and HRQOL.

Results

Fifty-nine patients completed baseline HRQOL assessments; 41% were treated for ALL. Median age was 17 years and 46% identified as female. Participants completed a median of six assessments, with nearly 75% obtained within the first month. Scores were worst at baseline (mean [SD]: PedsQL Generic: 64.9 [18.4], PedsQL Cancer: 70.0 [16.2], MSAS: 24.4 [19.4]) and improved post-infusion. The greatest gains from baseline to 4 weeks were seen in physical functioning (mean + 8) and worry (mean + 20). Across all timepoints, the most burdensome symptoms were fatigue, worry, pain, nervousness, and anorexia. Symptom burden demonstrated a strong negative correlation with HRQOL (r = - 0.81, p <  0.0001).

Conclusions

Pediatric patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy experience generally favorable HRQOL trajectories and modest, time-limited symptom burden. Serial patient-reported outcome collection is feasible in this population and provides actionable insight to guide supportive care delivery.

DOI

10.1002/1545-5017.70589

PMID

42535788

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in