Back to research feed

Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery

August 16, 2025 · via Europe PMC

Evans Calcaneal Osteotomy.

Shane AM, Reeves C, Smith R, Memmelaar S.

ReviewAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

This article reviews the indications and technique of the Evans calcaneal osteotomy for pes planovalgus, including less traditional indications.

What was studied

A narrative review of the Evans lateral column lengthening osteotomy.

Key findings

  • Surgery is indicated after failed conservative therapy or unsuitable deformity
  • Pes planovalgus correction often requires multiple procedures
  • The Evans osteotomy offers robust triplanar correction
  • Expanded, non-traditional indications are discussed

Clinical relevance

Technique-focused; no outcome data are presented in the abstract.

Who should care

General Surgery

Limitations

Narrative review abstract without systematic methods or original data.

The Evans osteotomy is a versatile tool for flatfoot correction.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Pes planovalgus is a prevalent deformity treated globally by foot and ankle surgeons. Surgical correction is indicated when a patient has failed conservative therapy or the deformity is unsuitable for conservative treatment. While correction of pes planovalgus often requires multiple procedures, the Evans osteotomy is widely utilized due to the robust triplanar correction it offers. This article aims to review the indications and surgical technique of the Evans osteotomy, while expanding on its indications that are not traditionally considered.

DOI

10.1016/j.cpm.2025.07.004

PMID

41266069

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in