Back to research feed

CVIR endovascular

August 27, 2026 Ā· via Europe PMC

Superior hypogastric nerve block versus spinal anesthesia for early pain control after uterine fibroid embolization: a prospective quasi-randomized comparative study.

da Silva PH, Mendes GBT, Nunes TF, Fornazari VAV, Salazar GMM, Puchnick A, Goldman SM, Szejnfeld D.

research-articleOpen access

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

In a small quasi-randomized study, superior hypogastric nerve block and spinal anesthesia resulted in similar rescue morphine use and early pain after uterine fibroid embolization.

What was studied

Single-center prospective quasi-randomized (alternating allocation, unblinded) study of 42 women undergoing UFE, comparing superior hypogastric nerve block (n = 21) with spinal anesthesia (n = 21).

Key findings

  • Rescue morphine use 61.9% in both groups (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.62-1.61)
  • No difference in pain trajectory (interaction P = .650) or pain at 1, 6 or 18 hours
  • Larger fibroid diameter associated with higher pain and morphine requirement
  • SHNB technically successful in all patients with no block-related complications

Clinical relevance

This supports the feasibility of SHNB as a procedural analgesic option for UFE, but the small unblinded quasi-randomized design does not establish equivalence with spinal anesthesia.

Who should care

Interventional Radiology

Limitations

Small sample, no allocation concealment or blinding, single center, and short 18-hour observation.

Hypogastric nerve block appears feasible for UFE pain control, with no clear advantage over spinal anesthesia.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Purpose

To compare early postprocedural pain and rescue opioid use after uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) in patients treated with superior hypogastric nerve block (SHNB) versus spinal anesthesia.

Materials and methods

This single-center prospective quasi-randomized comparative study included consecutive women with symptomatic intramural uterine fibroids treated between March 2022 and October 2023. Patients were allocated according to a predefined alternating sequence to SHNB or spinal anesthesia. Allocation concealment was not used, and patients, treating teams, and outcome assessors were not blinded. Pain was assessed at 1, 6, and 18 h after embolization using a 0-10 visual numeric scale. Rescue analgesia consisted of 3 mg intravenous morphine for moderate or severe pain according to a standardized institutional protocol. The primary endpoint was any rescue morphine use during the 18-h postprocedural observation period. Secondary endpoints were total rescue morphine dose and pain scores over time. Pain trajectory was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, and rescue morphine outcomes were analyzed using modified Poisson and Poisson regression models.

Results

Forty-two patients were included, with 21 in each group. Baseline characteristics were reasonably balanced, with all absolute standardized mean differences below 0.40. Rescue morphine use occurred in 13 of 21 patients (61.9%) in each group (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-1.61). No significant treatment-by-time interaction was observed for pain trajectory (P = .650), and time-specific between-group differences in pain scores were not significant at 1, 6, or 18 h. In adjusted analyses, treatment group was not associated with pain trajectory, any rescue morphine use, or total rescue morphine dose. Larger fibroid diameter was associated with higher pain burden and greater morphine requirement. SHNB was technically successful in all patients and was not associated with block-related complications during the assessed follow-up window.

Conclusion

In this small prospective quasi-randomized comparative study, no detectable between-group differences were observed in rescue morphine use or early postprocedural pain scores between SHNB and spinal anesthesia after UFE. These exploratory findings support the feasibility of SHNB as a procedural analgesic strategy but should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence or noninferiority.

DOI

10.1186/s42155-026-00749-w

PMID

42649321

PMCID

PMC13518766

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account Ā· Sign in