Back to research feed

BMC anesthesiology

August 5, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Association between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and postoperative inflammatory indices and analgesic outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Perek A, Tulgar S, Reysner T, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Pietraszek P, Marszałek-Buko J, Reysner M.

Randomized Controlled TrialOpen access

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

In older adults having hip arthroplasty, PENG block was associated with lower postoperative inflammatory indices, better pain control, and less opioid use than a sham block.

What was studied

A quadruple-blinded RCT of 60 patients aged 60 or older having elective unilateral THA under spinal anesthesia, randomized to PENG block with ropivacaine or sham block.

Key findings

  • 12-h NLR 5.98 with PENG vs 9.60 with sham
  • Better pain control and reduced opioid requirements with PENG
  • Other statistics: specific statistic not fully captured in the abstract

Clinical relevance

Supports PENG for analgesia; inflammatory marker findings are associative, and impact on clinical recovery is unknown.

Who should care

Anaesthesiology

Limitations

Small single trial using indirect inflammatory markers.

PENG block eased pain after hip replacement and was linked to lower inflammatory markers.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) induces a pronounced postoperative inflammatory response that contributes to pain, increased opioid requirements, and delayed recovery, particularly in older adults. Although the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides effective analgesia, its impact on systemic inflammation remains insufficiently defined.

Methods

In this prospective, randomized, quadruple-blinded controlled trial, patients aged ≥ 60 years undergoing elective unilateral THA performed under spinal anesthesia were randomized (1:1) to receive an ultrasound-guided PENG block with ropivacaine or a sham block. The primary outcome was the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at 12 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at 12, 24, and 48 h, postoperative pain scores, time to first opioid administration, and cumulative opioid consumption within 48 h.

Results

Sixty patients completed the study (30 per group). Baseline inflammatory markers were comparable between groups. At 12 h, NLR was significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (5.98 ± 1.42 vs. 9.60 ± 1.83; adjusted p < 0.0001), with sustained reductions at 24 h (2.47 ± 0.77 vs. 5.71 ± 1.74; adjusted p < 0.0001) and 48 h (1.84 ± 0.71 vs. 3.53 ± 1.08; adjusted p < 0.0001). PLR was also significantly lower in the PENG group at all postoperative time points (all adjusted p < 0.0001), with a significantly different postoperative trajectory between groups over time. The PENG block significantly prolonged time to first opioid administration (15.0 ± 1.5 vs. 9.3 ± 1.7 h; p < 0.001) and reduced cumulative 48-h opioid consumption (13.2 ± 2.7 vs. 20.8 ± 3.2 mg; p < 0.001). Pain scores at rest and during mobilization were consistently lower in the PENG group throughout the first 24 h.

Conclusions

In older adults undergoing THA, the PENG block was associated with lower postoperative inflammatory indices, improved pain control, and reduced opioid requirements. Because NLR and PLR are indirect inflammatory markers, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and viewed as associative rather than mechanistic. Further studies are required to determine whether these physiological differences translate into improved clinical recovery outcomes.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07023107), registered on 8 June 2025.

DOI

10.1186/s12871-026-04084-4

PMID

42723015

PMCID

PMC13560387

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in