Indian dermatology online journal
September 8, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Artificial Intelligence in Indian Dermatology: An IADVL Academy Position Statement and Policy Framework for Safe, Equitable, and Effective Adoption.
Bhatt S, Poojary S, Khan BI, Madhumita M, Gupta S, Vendhan S.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
An IADVL position statement sets out India-adapted principles for safe, equitable adoption of AI in dermatology, emphasising clinician oversight and validation in skin of colour.
What was studied
Position statement based on narrative synthesis of international society statements and regulatory frameworks, adapted to Indian regulations.
Key findings
- Seven domains analysed: governance, evidence, data bias, clinical safety, privacy, liability, education
- Principles: clinician-in-the-loop, prospective multicentric Indian validation, skin-of-colour inclusivity, transparency, post-market surveillance
- Clinical utility and health-economic evidence remain limited
Clinical relevance
This offers a framework for evaluating AI tools before clinical use in India; it is policy guidance rather than evidence of benefit.
Who should care
Limitations
Narrative synthesis and expert opinion.
AI in dermatology needs local validation and clinician oversight.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems, particularly deep learning models, are increasingly used in dermatology for image analysis, triage, remote monitoring, and decision support. For real-world adoption in the Indian dermatology ecosystem, robust validation, transparency, and governance are essential to protect patient safety and equity. This position statement synthesizes guidance from international dermatology societies and major regulatory approaches, and proposes India-adapted recommendations across clinical use, dataset curation, validation standards, ethics, privacy, liability, and policy. We performed a narrative synthesis of position statements from the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), British Association of Dermatologists (BAD), and Australasian College of Dermatologists (ACD); regulatory frameworks, including the European Union Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR), the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) approach, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) evidence standards, and Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Indian frameworks, including the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) Medical Device Rules, Bureau of Indian Standards/International Organization for Standardization (BIS/ISO) standards, the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) artificial intelligence ethics guidance were included. Seven domains were analyzed: governance, evidence generation, data bias, clinical safety, privacy, liability, and education. Principles emphasize clinician-in-the-loop use, prospective multicentric validation in representative Indian settings, skin-of-color inclusivity, transparent labeling and explainability, post-market surveillance, and clearer accountability. While clinical utility and health-economic evidence remain limited, validated and inclusive AI tools can responsibly expand access to quality dermatologic care in India, particularly in underserved areas.
DOI
10.4103/idoj.idoj_1250_25
PMID
42714465
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed