Back to research feed

Indian dermatology online journal

August 18, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Unmasking the Hidden Risk: Urticaria and Angioedema with Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Lunge S, Baghel A, Patil VB, Sardesai VR, Sardesai VR.

Journal ArticleOpen access

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Nine patients developed urticaria or angioedema within 1-10 days of starting direct oral anticoagulants, resolving after discontinuation.

What was studied

Case series of nine patients with cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions to rivaroxaban or dabigatran.

Key findings

  • Onset within 1-10 days of initiation
  • Rivaroxaban associated with angioedema and urticaria; dabigatran with urticaria only
  • All resolved with discontinuation and symptomatic treatment

Clinical relevance

This suggests considering DOACs as a cause of new urticaria or angioedema, though causality was not confirmed by rechallenge.

Who should care

Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy

Limitations

Small series without rechallenge confirmation.

New hives or swelling after starting a DOAC? Consider the drug.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as rivaroxaban and dabigatran, are widely used for thromboembolic conditions. While bleeding is the most well-recognized adverse effect, rare cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions, such as urticaria and angioedema, are increasingly reported. We describe a case series of nine patients who developed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions to DOACs. All patients developed symptoms within 1-10 days of DOAC initiation. Rivaroxaban was associated with angioedema and urticaria, whereas dabigatran was limited to urticaria. All reactions resolved after drug discontinuation and symptomatic treatment. Dermatologic adverse effects of DOACs, although uncommon, warrant heightened clinical suspicion. A limitation of this study is the small sample size and absence of rechallenge confirmation of hypersensitivity. Management should be individualized. Increased awareness among dermatologists and physicians is crucial for timely management and pharmacovigilance.

DOI

10.4103/idoj.idoj_1280_25

PMID

42617032

PMCID

PMC13588453

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in