Prehospital and disaster medicine
December 1, 2025 · via Europe PMC
Telemedicine and Bystander CPR Rates.
Thompson SN, Brady ZT, Drees W, +5 more, Winckler C.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
In San Antonio, dispatcher use of video telecommunication was associated with higher pre-arrival bystander CPR rates (62% vs 46%) in OHCA.
What was studied
A retrospective review of 779 attempted resuscitations in the San Antonio Fire Department EMS system (2021-2022), comparing cases with and without GoodSAM video telecommunication by paramedic telecommunicators.
Key findings
- Pre-arrival CPR 62% (46/74) with video vs 46% (324/705) without (difference 16.2%, 95% CI 4.6-27.9%).
- Family members more often performed CPR with video (35% vs 17%).
Clinical relevance
This suggests video-enabled dispatch may increase bystander CPR, though selection of cases for video and lack of outcome data limit conclusions.
Who should care
Limitations
Retrospective study with small video group and possible selection bias; survival not assessed.
Video calls with dispatchers were linked to more bystander CPR before EMS arrival.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Objective
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to be associated with increased rates of survival from non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). GoodSAM is a platform integrated into the computer-assisted dispatch system. The software allows the telecommunicator to send a link to the caller's smart phone. Once activated, the telecommunicator can see and hear the patient, and obtain breathing and heart rates using the camera and microphone on the caller's phone. The telecommunicator can use the platform to identify cardiac arrest and provide real-time compression feedback. It was hypothesized that telecommunicator use of video telecommunication would be associated with increased rates of pre-arrival CPR.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of all cardiac arrest resuscitations performed from July 2021 through February 2022 in the San Antonio Fire Department (SAFD) Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system - the seventh largest city in the United States. Data source was the Office of the EMS Medical Director (OMD) Cardiac Arrest Registry. Inclusion criteria included cardiac arrests for which resuscitation was attempted. Exclusion criteria were cardiac arrest was witnessed by EMS personnel, or missing data. Dataset included: location of arrest, presumed etiology of the arrest, if dispatch CPR instructions were given; caller compliance; type of CPR performed; who witnessed the arrest; and who performed the CPR prior to EMS. Patients were dichotomized as to whether video telecommunication was used by the paramedic telecommunicator. A case was recorded as having received pre-arrival CPR if the initial CPR was performed by anyone other than the responding unit.
Results
A total of 779 cases were included in the study. Primary outcome, in the cases where video telecommunication was utilized, 46/74 (62%) received pre-arrival CPR, versus 324/705 (46%) without the use of video telecommunication, with an overall difference of 16.2% (95% CI, 4.6% to 27.9%; P = .008). When using video telecommunication, a larger proportion of the persons performing pre-arrival CPR were family members when compared to the cases where video telecommunication was not used (35% versus 17%).
Conclusion
Using video telecommunication to perform paramedic clinical dispatch telemedicine was associated with an increased rate of pre-arrival CPR. Further research will be required to show outcome-related results to determine if dispatch video and audio telemedicine can be used to increase survival in patients suffering OHCA.
DOI
10.1017/s1049023x2510160x
PMID
41479239
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed