Back to research feed

International journal of obesity (2005)

September 7, 2026 Β· via Europe PMC

Causal adiposity and clinical validation of regional fat distribution in PMOS: a multi-modal analysis integrating GBD 2021, Mendelian randomization, and machine learning.

Zhao G, Jin Y, Yang A, +5 more, Gao B.

Journal ArticleAbstract only β€” full text under license

AI summary β€” for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Combining global burden data, Mendelian randomization, and machine learning, adiposity, particularly regional fat distribution, appears to be a causal and clinically relevant determinant of PMOS.

What was studied

A multi-modal analysis using GBD 2021 data, two-sample Mendelian randomization of adiposity traits, and machine learning in a clinical cohort with body composition measurements.

Key findings

  • About 69.5 million women affected globally in 2021; age-standardized prevalence 1,757.8 per 100,000
  • MR: BMI OR 2.60, body fat percentage OR 3.32, trunk fat OR 2.54, left-leg fat OR 3.44; fat-free mass not associated
  • XGBoost AUC 0.701 in testing
  • Left-leg fat, trunk fat, body fat percentage, and protein mass were top predictors

Clinical relevance

Supports considering body composition beyond BMI in PMOS risk; the prediction model has modest accuracy.

Who should care

Endocrinology

Limitations

MR assumptions and modest model performance; clinical cohort size not stated in the abstract.

Where body fat is stored may influence PMOS risk.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates β€” verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Background

Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS), previously named polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), is the most common endocrine disorder among women of reproductive age and a leading cause of anovulatory infertility. However, the evolving global burden of PMOS and the role of adiposity, particularly regional fat distribution, remain incompletely understood. We integrated global epidemiological analysis, genetic causal inference, and clinical prediction modeling to investigate the burden and adiposity-related determinants of PMOS.

Methods

Using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database, we assessed age-specific and socio-demographic index (SDI)-specific patterns of PMOS burden. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was performed to examine genetic evidence linking overall and regional adiposity traits to PMOS and anovulation-associated infertility. Machine-learning (ML) models were subsequently developed and internally validated in a clinical cohort with detailed body-composition measurements, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret model predictions.

Results

In 2021, PMOS affected approximately 69.5 million women globally, with an age-standardized prevalence rate of 1,757.8 per 100,000. The highest modeled incidence occurred in the 10-14-year age group, and approximately 12.5 million infertility cases were attributable to PMOS worldwide. MR analyses provided genetic evidence supporting adiposity as a risk factor for PMOS, including body mass index (OR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.84-3.66), body fat percentage (OR = 3.32, 95% CI 1.97-5.58), trunk fat mass (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.79-3.60), and left-leg fat mass (OR = 3.44, 95% CI 2.19-5.40), whereas fat-free mass showed no significant association. In ML analyses, XGBoost achieved the best predictive performance in the testing set (AUC = 0.701), and SHAP identified left-leg fat mass, trunk fat mass, percent body fat, and protein mass as the most influential predictors.

Conclusions

Adiposity, particularly regional fat distribution, appears to be a clinically relevant determinant of PMOS. The convergence of global epidemiological patterns, genetic evidence, and clinical prediction supports the importance of body-composition phenotypes beyond conventional obesity measures in understanding PMOS risk.

DOI

10.1038/s41366-026-02208-x

PMID

42706389

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account Β· Sign in