Back to research feed

Journal of Crohn's & colitis

July 1, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Retention of the ileocolic pedicle correlates with higher postoperative endoscopic recurrence risk in Crohn's disease ileocolic resection.

Zhang C, Liu G, Bi J, +7 more, Li Y.

Observational StudyAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

In a multicenter retrospective study, a longer residual ileocolic artery after Crohn's ileocolic resection was associated with higher risk of endoscopic recurrence.

What was studied

A multicenter retrospective study of 270 Crohn's patients who underwent ileocolic resection (2019-2024), measuring residual ileocolic artery length on postoperative CT as a marker of residual mesentery and relating it to endoscopic recurrence.

Key findings

  • 90 patients (33.3%) had endoscopic recurrence at first postoperative endoscopy
  • Longer residual ileocolic artery length was associated with higher recurrence risk in LASSO regression and a derived nomogram
  • 32.8 mm was identified as the optimal cutoff for predicting recurrence
  • Time-to-recurrence results by cutoff: specific statistic not fully captured in the abstract

Clinical relevance

The findings add to debate about mesenteric resection in Crohn's surgery, but the authors stress that the observational data do not prove that dividing the pedicle is protective.

Who should care

Medical Gastroenterology

Limitations

Retrospective observational design; the authors explicitly note causation cannot be inferred.

Leaving more mesentery behind after Crohn's surgery was linked to earlier disease return, but it is not proven to cause it.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Background and aims

The role of residual mesentery after ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease (CD) remains controversial. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the association between postoperative residual ileocolic artery length (RIAL), a surrogate marker of residual mesenteric burden, and endoscopic recurrence (ER) in CD.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study involved patients with CD who underwent ileocolic resection between January 2019 and December 2024. RIAL was measured using postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The primary outcome was ER at the first endoscopic assessment. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was used to identify predictors of ER and to construct a nomogram. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were applied to evaluate ER outcome within 36 months after surgery.

Results

Among 270 patients, 90 (33.3%) developed ER at the first postoperative endoscopy. LASSO logistic regression and the derived nomogram identified that a longer RIAL was associated with an increased risk of ER. ROC curve analysis identified 32.8 mm as the optimal cutoff of RIAL for predicting ER. Kaplan-Meier curve showed that patients with a RIAL < 32.8 mm had significantly longer ER-free survival (log-rank P < .001). Cox analysis identified an RIAL < 32.8 mm and the postoperative use of biologics were independent protective factors for ER-free survival.

Conclusions

Postoperative ER risk was positively correlated with RIAL in CD. Though these correlative data reveal at a statistical association between ileocolic pedicle division and reduced ER risk, our observational analysis does not prove a causal protective effect of pedicle resection.

DOI

10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjag116

PMID

42501364

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in