Back to research feed

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

July 23, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Perspectives on digital recovery platforms in perioperative care: insights from patients and clinicians.

Abeles A, Kwasnicki RM, Goyal C, Darzi A.

Journal ArticleAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Patients and clinicians saw value in wearable activity monitor data for postoperative recovery, but clinicians raised concerns about resource burden and data management.

What was studied

A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews of six postoperative patients and five healthcare professionals at an NHS trust.

Key findings

  • Patient themes: practicality, value, functionality and data display
  • Patients valued motivational feedback but differed in preferred data presentation
  • Clinicians saw data as useful for recovery and discharge planning
  • Concerns about resource burden and data management

Clinical relevance

Informs design of digital recovery tools; very small qualitative sample.

Who should care

General Surgery

Limitations

Very small single-trust qualitative sample.

Wearable recovery data appeal to patients and clinicians if well integrated into care.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Introduction

Digital health technologies, including wearable activity monitors (WAMs), have the potential to transform perioperative care by improving patient engagement and enhancing clinical decision making. However, there is limited qualitative research exploring how patients and healthcare professionals perceive such tools within the perioperative setting.

Methods

A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with six postoperative patients and five healthcare professionals at an Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. Participants interacted with physical activity data generated from WAMs and viewed on smart devices. Transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis, following the Framework Methodology.

Results

Four key themes emerged from patient interviews: practicality, value, functionality and the WAM as a data collection/display tool. Patients valued the feedback for motivation and recovery tracking, but varied in preferred data presentation. Three themes emerged from healthcare professionals: value, multidisciplinary relationships and functionality. Clinicians viewed physical activity data as a useful adjunct to enhance recovery, discharge planning and patient empowerment; however, concerns about resource burden and data management were also noted.

Conclusions

Both patients and clinicians recognise the potential of digital recovery platforms to support individualised care and enhance postoperative recovery. Real-time feedback, user-friendly interfaces and integration with existing care pathways are critical for adoption. Future research should explore real-time deployment, broader surgical populations, and cost-effectiveness to inform wider implementation.

DOI

10.1308/rcsann.2026.0067

PMID

42489026

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in