Neurosurgical review
September 14, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Artificial intelligence in trigeminal neuralgia: trigeminal nerve segmentation and neurovascular conflict detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alvani MS, Mohammadzadeh I, Hajikarimloo B, +13 more, Borghei-Razavi H.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
A meta-analysis of 5 studies (577 patients) found AI models for trigeminal nerve segmentation and neurovascular conflict detection on MRI had pooled sensitivity 71%, specificity 92%, and AUC 0.91.
What was studied
Systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of studies using deep learning or machine learning for trigeminal neuralgia MRI analysis.
Key findings
- Pooled sensitivity 71% (95% CI 65-76%)
- Pooled specificity 92% (95% CI 88-94%)
- Positive DLR 8.5; negative DLR 0.32; DOR 26.71
- AUC 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93)
Clinical relevance
This suggests AI tools may help identify neurovascular conflict on MRI, but the small number of studies and moderate sensitivity mean they are not ready to replace expert review.
Who should care
Limitations
Only 5 studies with heterogeneous reference standards (some imaging-based rather than surgical confirmation).
AI can spot trigeminal neurovascular conflict on MRI with good specificity, but it misses some cases.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating condition characterized by severe, episodic facial pain, often caused by neurovascular conflict (NVC) at the trigeminal nerve root. Early and accurate diagnosis of TN is crucial for effective management, with microvascular decompression (MVD) being a common surgical treatment. While MRI plays a key role in detecting NVC, its subjective nature limits diagnostic precision. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising tools for enhancing diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluates the potential of deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models in improving TN diagnosis through automated segmentation and NVC detection in MRI scans. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies utilizing AI models in TN diagnosis. Studies assessing sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 5 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 577 patients with confirmed TN. The primary focus was on evaluating the performance of AI models in segmenting the trigeminal nerve and identifying neurovascular conflicts. The reference standard or target criterion used to define correct model performance was also extracted and considered, including expert imaging-based annotation, clinical-radiological diagnosis, and intraoperative confirmation where available. The pooled sensitivity of AI models in detecting TN was 71% (95% CI: 65-76%), with a specificity of 92% (95% CI: 88-94%). The positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) was 8.5 (95% CI: 5.75-12.56), and the negative DLR was 0.32 (95% CI: 0.26-0.38). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 26.71 (95% CI: 16.38-43.56), and the area under the curve (AUC) reached 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93). These findings demonstrate the high diagnostic accuracy of AI models, particularly in identifying NVC and improving preoperative planning for TN patients. AI models, particularly DL-based approaches, show promising diagnostic performance in the segmentation of the trigeminal nerve and detection of NVC. The high specificity and diagnostic odds ratio suggest that AI can play a critical role in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving the accuracy of TN diagnosis, ultimately aiding in better treatment planning for patients.
DOI
10.1007/s10143-026-04486-5
PMID
42734878
PMCID
PMC13574729
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed