Back to research feed

Indian journal of surgical oncology

January 3, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Validation of CPS+EG Staging System in a Cohort of Eastern Indian Breast Cancer Patients.

Ganti SD, Jain P, Saha P, +15 more, Muduly DK.

Journal ArticleAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

The CPS+EG staging system, incorporating clinical and pathological stage, ER status and grade, outperformed clinical staging alone for prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Eastern Indian breast cancer patients.

What was studied

Retrospective validation study of 208 locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Eastern India (2016-2023).

Key findings

  • Median follow-up 24 months; recurrence 22.1%, mortality 16.3%
  • 5-year OS 67%, DFS 39.3%
  • No patients with score 6 survived 5 years
  • AUC 0.75 (OS) and 0.73 (DFS) vs 0.57 and 0.58 for clinical stage

Clinical relevance

This supports using CPS+EG for prognostication after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Indian breast cancer patients.

Who should care

Surgical Oncology

Limitations

Retrospective single-center study with short follow-up; DFS by score not monotonic.

CPS+EG staging predicts outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy better than clinical stage in Indian patients.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become standard for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), offering opportunities for tailored treatment and improved survival. However, current staging systems fail to incorporate treatment response into prognosis. The CPS+EG staging system presents a novel approach, integrating clinical and pathological stages with ER status and nuclear grade. While validated in Western cohorts, its applicability in Indian patients remains unexplored. This study aimed to validate CPS+EG in an Eastern Indian cohort (n=208) treated with NACT. A retrospective analysis of data from 2016 to 2023 was done. The CPS+EG scores for all the eligible patients were calculated. Clinicopathologic characteristics and patient outcomes were assessed. The discrimination of CPS+EG and CS was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for survival data, calculated using Receiver operating time (ROC) curves. CPS+EG effectively stratified patients, with higher scores correlating with poorer outcomes. Median follow-up was 24 months, with 22.1% recurrence and 16.3% mortality. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 67%, and disease-free survival (DFS) 39.3%. The 5-year DFS for CPS+EG scores 1-5 was 50%, 75%, 58.3%, 44.3%, and 37.9%, respectively. None of the patients with a score of 6 survived for 5 years. CPS+EG outperformed CS alone, with AUCs of 0.75 (OS) and 0.73 (DFS) versus 0.57 and 0.58, respectively. This study fills a literature gap by validating CPS+EG in Eastern Indian patients, highlighting its utility in the prognostication of post-NACT patients. CPS+EG offers a simple yet effective, promising tool for personalized prognosis, warranting further investigation and clinical integration.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become standard for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), offering opportunities for tailored treatment and improved survival. However, current staging systems fail to incorporate treatment response into prognosis. The CPS+EG staging system presents a novel approach, integrating clinical and pathological stages with ER status and nuclear grade. While validated in Western cohorts, its applicability in Indian patients remains unexplored. This study aimed to validate CPS+EG in an Eastern Indian cohort (n=208) treated with NACT. A retrospective analysis of data from 2016 to 2023 was done. The CPS+EG scores for all the eligible patients were calculated. Clinicopathologic characteristics and patient outcomes were assessed. The discrimination of CPS+EG and CS was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for survival data, calculated using Receiver operating time (ROC) curves. CPS+EG effectively stratified patients, with higher scores correlating with poorer outcomes. Median follow-up was 24 months, with 22.1% recurrence and 16.3% mortality. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 67%, and disease-free survival (DFS) 39.3%. The 5-year DFS for CPS+EG scores 1-5 was 50%, 75%, 58.3%, 44.3%, and 37.9%, respectively. None of the patients with a score of 6 survived for 5 years. CPS+EG outperformed CS alone, with AUCs of 0.75 (OS) and 0.73 (DFS) versus 0.57 and 0.58, respectively. This study fills a literature gap by validating CPS+EG in Eastern Indian patients, highlighting its utility in the prognostication of post-NACT patients. CPS+EG offers a simple yet effective, promising tool for personalized prognosis, warranting further investigation and clinical integration.

DOI

10.1007/s13193-025-02502-6

PMID

42661949

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in