Cornea
October 7, 2025 · via Europe PMC
Deep Learning Model for Extensive Diagnosis of Corneal Deposits.
Taki Y, Ueno Y, Oda M, Kitaguchi Y, Maehara H, Yamaguchi T.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
A YOLOv5-based deep learning model classified seven corneal deposit conditions with an overall PPV of 0.96 on a test set, outperforming specialists and residents.
What was studied
Retrospective development of a deep learning model on 1,546 slit-lamp images of 7 corneal opacity types, tested on 303 images and compared with clinicians.
Key findings
- Overall PPV 0.94 across categories
- High PPV for band keratopathy (0.95), GCD (0.95), SCD (0.99)
- Lower PPV for amyloidosis (0.75) and GDLD (0.75)
- Test set PPV: model 0.96, specialists 0.89, residents 0.67
Clinical relevance
This suggests AI could assist in recognizing corneal deposits and dystrophies, though weaker performance for rarer entities and lack of external validation limit current use.
Who should care
Limitations
Retrospective single-dataset development; small numbers for rare conditions; no external validation.
AI can recognize many corneal deposits well, but not yet all.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Purpose
We developed a comprehensive artificial intelligence DL model (CorneAI) to classify cataracts and corneal diseases into 9 categories. In this study, we aimed to enhance CorneAI by developing a deep learning (DL) model to diagnose the following conditions associated with corneal deposition: amyloidosis, band keratopathy, granular corneal dystrophy (GCD), lattice corneal dystrophy (LCD), gelatinous drop-like dystrophy (GDLD), Schnyder corneal dystrophy (SCD), and macular corneal dystrophy (MCD).
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 1546 slit-lamp images of 7 corneal opacities using You Only Look Once version 5 (YOLOv5). The model was trained with 5-fold cross-validation and tested on 303 images. DL model performance was compared with specialists and residents and evaluated.
Results
The positive predictive value (PPV) for all categories was 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-0.96]. The highest PPVs for the individual diseases were relatively good, with 0.95 (0.93-0.97) for band keratopathy, 0.95 (0.94-0.97) for GCD, 0.83 (0.76-0.89) for LCD, 0.99 (0.97-0.99) for SCD, and 0.88 (0.65-0.96) for MCD. However, the PPVs for amyloid and GDLD were relatively low, at 0.75 (0.53-0.88) and 0.75 (0.46-0.91), respectively. When comparing DL model and human performance using a test dataset of 303 images, the PPVs were 0.96 (0.94-0.98) for our DL model, 0.89 (0.85-0.92) for specialists, and 0.67(0.61-0.72) for residents.
Conclusions
Our DL model accurately diagnosed band keratopathy, GCD, LCD, SCD, and MCD although it was not precise enough to classify amyloidosis or GDLD. Although its performance first needs to be improved, this will be the first DL model to be installed in CorneAI for future.
DOI
10.1097/ico.0000000000004018
PMID
41236421
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed