Back to research feed

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology

September 23, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Dosimetric correlation of radiation-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD): a competing risks analysis.

Wang YM, Chen CS, Cheng JY, Wang CJ, Huang EY

Journal ArticleAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Radiation-induced chronic kidney disease after para-aortic radiotherapy depended on mean kidney dose and baseline kidney function, with risk even at doses below accepted limits.

What was studied

A retrospective competing-risks analysis of 126 gynecologic cancer patients treated with extended-field or salvage para-aortic radiotherapy (39.6-62 Gy) between 2000 and 2023.

Key findings

  • 7-year cumulative incidence of stage 3A or worse CKD was 17.0%, 20.9% and 55.7% across the three dose-function groups
  • Stage 3B or worse CKD was 0%, 13.9% and 26.4%
  • Mean kidney doses of 5-9.9 Gy carried measurable risk of stage 3B CKD, below the QUANTEC ceiling of 15-18 Gy

Clinical relevance

It argues for stricter kidney dose limits, especially in patients with reduced baseline eGFR.

Who should care

Radiation OncologyGynaecological OncologyMedical Oncology

Limitations

A retrospective single-source cohort of 126 patients with grouping details partially truncated in the abstract.

Keep mean kidney dose below 5 Gy when feasible, particularly in patients with lower baseline eGFR.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To determine the competing risks (CR) cumulative incidence of radiation-induced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and identify independent dosimetric predictors in patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) involving the para-aortic lymph nodes (PALNs), providing evidence to refine kidney dose constraints in contemporary RT planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2000 to September 2023, 126 patients with gynecological malignancies receiving extended-field RT (EFRT) or salvage PALN RT were retrospectively analyzed. The planned PALN dose was 39.6-62 Gy/22-31 fractions. Patients with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 mwere excluded. CKD was defined as stage 3A (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m) or stage 3B (eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m). Mean kidney dose (MKD) groups: Group 1 (<5 Gy), Group 2 (5-9.9 Gy), and Group 3 (≥10 Gy). CR analysis with Gray's test and the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model accounted for the competing risk of death without CKD.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 55 months, 7-year CR cumulative incidences of stage ≥ 3A CKD were 17.0 %, 20.9 %, and 55.7 % in Groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.008), respectively; corresponding rates for stage ≥ 3B CKD were 0 %, 13.9 %, and 26.4 % (p = 0.041). Patients with pre-RT eGFR < 75 ml/min/1.73 mhad significantly higher 7-year CR rates of stage 3A (57.1 % vs. 23.2 %; p < 0.001) and stage 3B CKD (37.2 % vs. 7.6 %; p = 0.005). Multivariate CR analysis identified MKD group (p = 0.012) and pre-RT eGFR < 75 ml/min/1.73 m(p = 0.023) as independent predictors of stage 3B CKD.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation-induced CKD is significantly correlated with MKD and baseline eGFR. Even MKD values of 5-9.9 Gy carry measurable risk of stage 3B CKD-below the QUANTEC-recommended ceiling of 15-18 Gy-suggesting that stricter MKD constraints (< 5 Gy) are warranted, particularly in patients with pre-RT eGFR < 75 ml/min/1.73 m.

DOI

10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111793

PMID

42772457

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in