Back to research feed

British journal of anaesthesia

September 29, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Association between supraglottic airway device use and respiratory adverse events during airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness: a report from the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia (J-PEDIA) registry.

Uchinami Y, Soejima T, Nishida S, Yamauchi Y, Watanabe F, Ichiyanagi S, Kaiho Y, Kojima T

Journal ArticleAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

In children with airway hyperresponsiveness, supraglottic airway use was associated with fewer respiratory adverse events than tracheal intubation during induction-phase airway management.

What was studied

A multicentre registry cohort (J-PEDIA, 12 institutions, 2022-2025) of 4,878 analysed encounters, 3,005 intubations and 1,873 SADs, using IPTW.

Key findings

  • After adjustment, SAD use had lower risk of respiratory adverse events (aRR 0.41)
  • The authors support considering SADs when clinically appropriate
  • Residual confounding is acknowledged

Clinical relevance

It supports SADs where suitable for children at risk of bronchospasm.

Who should care

Anaesthesiology

Limitations

Retrospective registry data with choice of device driven by clinical judgement, so confounding remains despite weighting.

Consider a SAD rather than intubation in suitable children with airway hyperresponsiveness.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with airway hyperresponsiveness face higher risks of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Although the use of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) is associated with fewer perioperative respiratory adverse events than tracheal intubation in selected paediatric populations, evidence remains limited regarding induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. We aimed to investigate the association between SAD placement (vs tracheal intubation) and respiratory adverse events during induction-phase airway management in children with airway hyperresponsiveness using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting.

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 tertiary-care institutions (six paediatric and six mixed adult-paediatric university hospitals) in the Japan Paediatric Difficult Airway in Anaesthesia registry between July 2022 and February 2025. We included children aged <18 yr undergoing general anaesthesia who had an active upper respiratory tract infection, an upper respiratory tract infection within the preceding 14 days, asthma exacerbation, or household smoking exposure. The primary outcome was the occurrence of respiratory adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 27 844 encounters, 4878 were analysed (tracheal intubation 3005 of 4878 [61.6%]; SAD 1873 of 4878 [38.4%]). After adjustment, SAD placement was associated with a lower risk of respiratory adverse events (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.62; P<0.001), airway management-related adverse events (aRR 0.32; 95% CI 0.19-0.45; P<0.001), and severe oxygen desaturation (aRR 0.47; 95% CI 0.19-0.75; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, SAD use during induction of anaesthesia was associated with a lower risk of adverse respiratory events in children with airway hyperresponsiveness. These findings support consideration of SADs when clinically appropriate while acknowledging potential residual confounding.

DOI

10.1016/j.bja.2026.07.046

PMID

42810867

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in