Transplantation
September 10, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Two Genomes, one Outcome: Stratifying Donor and Recipient Polygenic Risk Score to Improve Kidney Allograft Longevity.
Swiatecka-Urban A, Mitash N, Koeppel AF, Turner SD
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
Polygenic risk scores combining donor and recipient genomes might improve kidney transplant risk assessment, but currently add only modest information.
What was studied
A narrative review of polygenic risk score methods and mechanisms (alloimmunity, fibrosis, metabolic dysfunction) in kidney transplantation.
Key findings
- Transplant PRS can capture donor organ liability and recipient susceptibility together
- Current PRS add only incremental variance beyond clinical predictors
- Limitations include European ancestry bias, small cohorts and incomplete replication
- Clinical actionability thresholds are undefined
Clinical relevance
It outlines a possible future direction for precision transplantation.
Who should care
Limitations
A narrative review of an immature field in which validation in diverse prospective cohorts is lacking.
No clinical use yet; watch for validation studies.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Kidney transplantation outcomes arise from complex interactions among donor organ quality, recipient susceptibility, and immunologic compatibility, yet conventional clinical risk models explain only a modest fraction of outcome variability. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer a promising framework to enhance transplant risk assessment by integrating genome-wide genetic information from both donor and recipient into biologically informed models. This narrative review examines the mechanistic basis for PRS application in kidney transplantation and variant clustering approaches that link polygenic signals to specific biological pathways underlying alloimmunity, fibrosis, and metabolic dysfunction. We compare current PRS construction methodologies, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations in transplant cohorts. Transplant PRS are distinguished from single-genome disease models by their capacity to capture dual-genome interactions, simultaneously quantifying inherited donor organ liability and recipient genetic susceptibility within an integrated framework. This dual-genome architecture requires novel risk stratification paradigms in which combined donor-recipient polygenic profiles inform pretransplant decision-making in ways that neither genome alone can achieve. However, current PRS contribute only incremental variance beyond established clinical predictors, and critical limitations persist, including European ancestry bias, small cohort sizes, incomplete replication, and undefined clinical actionability thresholds. We critically evaluate these implementation barriers and outline future directions for integrating dual-genome PRS with clinical, molecular, and environmental data. The longer-term goal is to advance precision kidney transplantation through applications such as donor selection, immunosuppression tailoring, and individualized posttransplant surveillance. Realizing this potential will require validation in adequately powered, ancestry diverse, prospective transplant cohorts.
DOI
10.1097/TP.0000000000005908
PMID
42721407
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed