European journal of haematology
September 11, 2026 ยท via Europe PMC
Serial VAF Kinetics Reveal Dynamic Clonal Evolution Associated With Progression in Clonal Cytopenia of Undetermined Significance.
Sadeghian Z, Chen MJ, Lyapichev KA, Fu CL, Chaulagain C, Diacovo MJ, Bosler DS, Behdad A
AI summary โ for doctors, generated from the abstract only
Tracking mutation allele frequency over time in clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance helped predict progression to myeloid neoplasm.
What was studied
Retrospective study of 55 CCUS patients with serial NGS (26 non-progressors, 29 progressors), using maximum annualised VAF slope alongside baseline features and CHRS.
Key findings
- Progressors had higher baseline mutation burden
- Rising VAF, especially in RUNX1, spliceosome and cohesin genes, accompanied progression
- Stable or declining VAFs were more common in stable CCUS
Clinical relevance
Suggests serial NGS could guide surveillance intensity and repeat marrow assessment.
Who should care
Limitations
Small retrospective single-group analysis where progressors had more follow-up, and the abstract is cut off.
Consider serial VAF monitoring as a possible adjunct, pending validation.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates โ verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) is a premalignant condition characterized by persistent cytopenias with somatic mutations but no morphologic evidence of overt myeloid neoplasia. While CCUS confers an elevated risk of progression to myeloid malignancies, the timing and biology of this transformation remain unpredictable. We hypothesized that the type of mutated gene and tracking clonal expansion over time via serial variant allele frequency (VAF) measurements may uncover early evolutionary signatures of malignant progression.
DESIGN
We retrospectively analyzed 55 CCUS patients who underwent serial next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing. Patients were stratified by their final clinical course at the time of this study as non-progressor (nโ=โ26) or progressor (nโ=โ29). Baseline clinicopathologic variables, mutation burden, and the presence of โฅโ1 high-risk mutation, which was defined in prior studies as SF3B1, SRSF2, ZRSR2, JAK2, TP53, RUNX1, FLT3, IDH1, and IDH2, were compared between groups. The maximum annualized VAF slope across all tracked mutations was used as the primary dynamic clonal expansion metric. Baseline risk was assessed using the Clonal Hematopoiesis Risk Score (CHRS), and maximum VAF slope was evaluated across CHRS categories to determine whether serial clonal kinetics provided additional prognostic value beyond baseline risk stratification.
RESULTS
Compared with non-progressors, progressors had a higher baseline mutation burden (pโ<โ0.01), more frequently harbored โฅโ1 high-risk mutation at baseline (pโ<โ0.01), and also more acquired new mutations during follow-up (pโ<โ0.01). Across longitudinally tracked mutations, progressor-associated clones more frequently demonstrated positive annualized VAF slopes, particularly involving RUNX1 (12.70%/year), STAG2 (13.09%/year), ASXL1 (6.44%/year), SRSF2 (4.29%/year), and U2AF1 (8.21%/year). Maximum annualized VAF slope correlated with CHRS risk category but also identified increased clonal expansion among progressors within the non-high CHRS subgroup (pโ=โ0.006), suggesting added dynamic prognostic value beyond static baseline risk classification.
CONCLUSION
Serial VAF kinetics are helpful in predicting progression and complement baseline clinicopathologic features and CHRS risk stratification in CCUS. Expanding VAF trajectories, particularly involving RUNX1, spliceosome genes, and cohesin-related genes, may reflect biologically active clonal evolution toward progression to myeloid neoplasm, whereas stable or declining VAFs were more often observed in stable CCUS. These findings support that longitudinal VAF monitoring could be a practical dynamic approach to identify patients who require closer surveillance or repeat marrow evaluation.
DOI
10.1111/ejh.70320
PMID
42728663
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed