American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
May 21, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing the tolerability of maribavir 400 mg twice daily versus standard-dose valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients.
Taber DJ, Culpepper H, Harris CE, +6 more, Hanish S.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
Maribavir had a similar rate of clinically significant leukopenia as valganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients, and no CMV breakthrough occurred in either arm.
What was studied
Single-center, open-label randomized trial of 70 high-CMV-risk adult kidney transplant recipients assigned 1:1 to maribavir twice daily or valganciclovir for prophylaxis, with 12 months of follow-up.
Key findings
- Clinically significant leukopenia did not differ significantly between arms (22.9% vs 5.7%, P=.084).
- The valganciclovir arm spent a larger proportion of prophylaxis days below the white cell threshold.
- No CMV breakthrough, disease or resistance occurred.
- Hospitalizations, rejection, graft loss and mortality did not differ.
Clinical relevance
Transplant physicians dealing with leukopenia from valganciclovir may see maribavir as a possible alternative worth further study.
Who should care
Limitations
It is a small single-center open-label trial that was likely underpowered to detect differences in leukopenia.
Maribavir may reduce leukopenia burden, but larger multicenter trials are needed to confirm it.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major contributor to morbidity after a kidney transplant. Although valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis is effective, its use is limited by leukopenia. Maribavir's (MAR) role in primary CMV prophylaxis is not established. We conducted a 12-month, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial including 70 adult recipients at high CMV risk randomized 1:1 to MAR 400 mg twice daily or VGC 900 mg daily. The incidence of clinically significant leukopenia during prophylaxis did not differ between arms (22.9% vs 5.7%, P = .084). For the secondary endpoint, VGC recipients spent a greater proportion of prophylaxis days below white blood cell thresholds (<3000/μL: 12.2% vs 2.4%, P < .001; <2000/μL: 3.0% vs 0.2%, P < .001; <1000/μL: 0.3% vs 0.1%, P = .027). As an exploratory endpoint, CMV outcomes appeared similar between arms, including any viremia (37% vs 43%, P = .626), polymerase chain reaction >1000 IU/mL (23% vs 31%, P = .420), and refractory infection (15% vs 17%, P = .743). No cases of CMV breakthrough, disease, or resistance occurred. Hospitalizations, rejection, graft loss, and mortality did not differ. In summary, as compared to VGC, MAR had a similar incidence of clinically significant leukopenia with reduced overall leukopenia burden. These findings should be confirmed in larger multicenter studies.
DOI
10.1016/j.ajt.2026.05.729
PMID
42173492
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed