American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
May 2, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Normothermic regional perfusion in kidney transplants with donors after controlled circulatory death: Functional benefits and safety in older recipients.
Toapanta N, Comas J, Diekmann F, +8 more, Bestard O.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
Normothermic regional perfusion in controlled DCD kidney transplants reduced delayed graft function and shortened hospital stay but did not change 5-year graft or patient survival.
What was studied
A national registry retrospective study of first kidney transplants from cDCD donors (2015 to 2023), with 410 propensity-matched pairs of NRP versus rapid recovery and a subgroup of recipients aged 65 or older.
Key findings
- DGF was 19% with NRP versus 34% with rapid recovery.
- Hospital stay was 11 versus 13 days.
- No significant differences in eGFR trajectories or in 5-year overall graft, death-censored graft or patient survival.
Clinical relevance
Transplant surgeons and nephrologists weighing donor procurement methods may find that NRP helps early outcomes, including in older recipients.
Who should care
Limitations
It is retrospective and registry-based, with matching limited to measured variables.
NRP may ease early recovery, though it may not alter mid-term survival.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is increasingly used in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) to mitigate ischemia-reperfusion injury. While NRP reduces delayed graft function (DGF), its impact on long-term outcomes, particularly in elderly recipients, remains uncertain. We retrospectively analyzed first kidney transplants from cDCD donors in a national registry (2015-2023). Outcomes after NRP were compared with rapid recovery (RR) using 1:1 propensity score matching based on donor/recipient age, comorbidities, and transplant year. A predefined subcohort analysis focused on recipients aged ≥65 years. Endpoints included DGF, hospital stay, renal function, and 5-year graft and patient survival. Among 1414 transplants, 1153 were eligible, and 410 matched pairs were analyzed. DGF and median hospital stay were significantly lower with NRP than with RR (19% vs 34%; odds ratio for RR vs NRP 2.87; 95% CI, 2.1-4.0; P < .001 and 11 vs 13 days; difference -2.0 days; 95% CI, -3.6 to -0.4; P = .012, respectively). No significant differences were observed in estimated glomerular filtration rate trajectories or 5-year overall graft survival (P = .896), death-censored graft survival (P = .666), and patient survival (P = .981). Results were consistent in recipients ≥65 years. In this large real-world cDCD cohort, NRP improved early posttransplant outcomes without influencing midterm graft or patient survival.
DOI
10.1016/j.ajt.2026.04.027
PMID
42082078
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed