Back to research feed

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association

July 4, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Trans-anastomotic stent does not impact the predictive value of drain fluid amylase after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Perri G, Maekawa A, Frigerio I, +7 more, Marchegiani G.

Multicenter StudyAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Trans-anastomotic stents did not undermine drain fluid amylase for predicting pancreatic fistula.

What was studied

Multicenter retrospective data on 1156 PD patients; 464 (40.1%) had stents.

Key findings

  • Baseline AUC 0.645 rose to 0.748 with POD1 DFA and 0.786 with POD3
  • POD5 improved over POD1 (P = 0.008) but not over POD3
  • DFA dynamics similar with or without stent

Clinical relevance

DFA remains usable with stents.

Who should care

Surgical Gastroenterology

Limitations

Retrospective; stent decisions non-random.

Early DFA still informs risk with stents.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Background

Drain fluid amylase (DFA) guides risk stratification and drain management after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), but its interpretation in patients with trans-anastomotic stents (TS) remains poorly defined.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed multicenter PD data, focusing on TS-managed patients. DFA was measured on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 5. The primary outcome was clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), with major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa) as a secondary outcome. Discrimination was evaluated by adding log-transformed DFA to a baseline model including high-risk PD and center.

Results

Among 1156 patients, 464 (40.1%) received TS. The baseline model yielded an AUC of 0.645, which increased to 0.748 with POD1 log(DFA) and to 0.786 with POD3 log(DFA); POD3 was not significantly different from POD1 (P = 0.056). In complete-case analyses including POD5, POD5 further improved discrimination compared with POD1 (P = 0.008), but was not statistically different from POD3 (P = 0.126). Although median DFA values were higher in TS patients (reflecting a greater prevalence of high-risk PD), DFA dynamics were similar to those of non-TS patients.

Discussion

Early DFA remains informative with TS. Integrating DFA with pre- and intraoperative risk features supports serial risk assessment in the early postoperative period.

DOI

10.1016/j.hpb.2026.06.021

PMID

42469123

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in