Back to research feed

Journal of the American Heart Association

October 16, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Exercise and Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: A Paradigm Shift Toward Informed, Personalized Activity Guidelines.

Jabagi H, Imperatore G, Nantsios A, +7 more, Grau JB

ReviewAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

This review argues that exercise guidance for thoracic aortic aneurysm is under-evidenced and should move toward individualized, evidence-informed activity rather than blanket restriction.

What was studied

Narrative review of how exercise-induced hemodynamic changes (higher stroke volume, systolic and pulse pressures, transient aortic stiffening) may affect the thoracic aortic wall, and of how current guidelines are extrapolated from abdominal aortic aneurysm data.

Key findings

  • Moderate aerobic exercise generally appears safe with potential cardiovascular benefits, but evidence for safe practice in thoracic aneurysm is limited.
  • Current guidelines frequently extrapolate from abdominal aortic aneurysm data, overlooking features of the thoracic aorta.
  • Prehabilitation and structured postoperative rehabilitation show promise but lack rigorous evaluation.

Clinical relevance

Clinicians counselling patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm lack strong data and should tailor activity advice to individual risk until better evidence is available.

Who should care

Cardiology

Limitations

As a narrative review the abstract reports no quantitative data or systematic search methods, and its call for a shift in practice rests on limited evidence.

Exercise in thoracic aortic aneurysm is likely beneficial in moderation but poorly studied, and prospective research is needed.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Exercise is widely recognized for its cardiovascular benefits; however, its safety and role in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) remains complex due to its distinctive biomechanical vulnerabilities. Fundamentally different from abdominal aortic aneurysms, TAAs develop from distinct pathophysiological processes that affect their hemodynamic responses to stressors and influence their risk of adverse aortic events. Exercise induces acute hemodynamic changes, including increased stroke volume, systolic and pulse pressures, and transient aortic stiffening. These changes impose mechanical stress on the aortic wall, potentially accelerating aneurysm progression or triggering adverse aortic events. Although moderate aerobic exercise generally appears safe with potential cardiovascular benefits, evidence supporting safe practices in TAAs is limited. Current guidelines frequently extrapolate from abdominal aortic aneurysm data, which overlook the specificities of the thoracic aorta. This review underscores the urgent need for comprehensive research, using advanced imaging, biomarker profiling, and real-time hemodynamic monitoring to understand how different exercise modalities and intensities affect TAAs. Well-designed prospective studies are crucial to improve risk stratification, optimize antihypertensive strategies, develop personalized exercise prescriptions, and provide evidence-informed guidance to patients. Perioperative strategies like prehabilitation and structured postoperative rehabilitation show promise but lack rigorous evaluation. Ultimately, this work advocates a paradigm shift from conservative inactivity toward informed, individualized physical activity regimens tailored to each patient's risk profile. This approach aims to maximize cardiovascular benefits while minimizing adverse aortic events, thereby improving overall health and quality of life in patients with TAAs.

DOI

10.1161/JAHA.125.046671

PMID

42885774

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in