Back to research feed

Journal of surgical oncology

October 16, 2026 Β· via Europe PMC

Combined Incisions in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Surgery: Safe Access Without Added Morbidity in a Single Center Retrospective Analysis.

Dahan BE, Messer N, Shamai S, +5 more, Nizri E

Journal ArticleAbstract only β€” full text under license

AI summary β€” for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Combined incisions in retroperitoneal sarcoma resection were not associated with more incisional hernia than a single midline incision.

What was studied

A retrospective cohort of 134 patients (2004-2025) comparing hernia rates by single midline vs combined incision.

Key findings

  • Incisional hernia occurred in 33.5% overall
  • 32.7% vs 37.0% in simple vs combined incisions (p = 0.883)
  • Larger tumor size was associated with lower hernia risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.98)

Clinical relevance

Surgeons can prioritize oncologic exposure without concern for added hernia risk.

Who should care

Gynaecological Oncology

Limitations

Retrospective, single center, long period, and the tumor-size finding is counterintuitive and may be chance.

No evidence of added hernia risk with combined incisions.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates β€” verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Incisional hernia is a prevalent long-term complication after open abdominal surgery, with reported rates exceeding 20%-30%. Despite extensive research on abdominal wall failure, evidence regarding incisional hernia after retroperitoneal sarcoma resections is scarce. Retroperitoneal sarcoma frequently requires wide exposure, and combined incisions are often used, yet their effect on incisional hernia risk is unknown. Our aim was to determine the incisional hernia rate in these surgeries and to determine its association with incision type.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 134 patients who underwent primary RPS resection between 2004 and 2025 at a tertiary referral center. Patients were grouped according to incision type: single midline or combined incisions. Clinicopathologic variables were collected from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Incisional hernia was identified by cross-sectional imaging.

RESULTS

Incisional hernia occurred in 33.5% of patients, with no significant difference between simple and combined incision groups (32.7% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.883). Time to hernia development was similar (log-rank p = 0.829). Tumor size was the only independent predictor of incisional hernia in a logistic regression model: larger tumors were associated with reduced hernia risk (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.98, p = 0.042). Incision type and other known risk factors were not associated with incisional hernia.

CONCLUSION

Combined incisions were not associated with a higher risk of incisional hernia, indicating that the additional exposure required for complex retroperitoneal sarcoma resections does not compromise long-term abdominal wall integrity. These findings support prioritizing optimal oncologic exposure when selecting incision type, without concern for increased hernia risk.

DOI

10.1002/jso.70430

PMID

42885498

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account Β· Sign in