Back to research feed

Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists

October 17, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Retrieval of Thrombosed Inferior Vena Cava Filter and Mechanical Thrombectomy of Associated Caval Thrombosis Using FlowTriever and ClotTriever Systems With the ClotTriever as Embolic Protection.

So SE, Chan DYS, Tam JSC, Pang SYC, Wong ACC, Cheng SWK.

IMAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

A case report describes removing a thrombosed IVC filter and clearing caval thrombus using ClotTriever and FlowTriever devices, with the ClotTriever used as improvised embolic protection.

What was studied

Single case of a 55-year-old man with anti-phospholipid syndrome and left leg DVT on warfarin who had an IVC filter placed before sarcoma resection, later developed caval thrombosis extending to the right below-knee veins, and underwent mechanical thrombectomy and filter removal.

Key findings

  • Thrombus was found on the filter at an earlier removal attempt 2 weeks after surgery, so the filter was left in place
  • The ClotTriever was placed alongside a 16Fr internal jugular sheath to remove the thrombosed filter, and the FlowTriever disc was deployed as proximal embolic protection
  • The procedure was successful with no symptoms of pulmonary embolism

Clinical relevance

Suggests an option for proximal embolic protection during caval thrombectomy when a dedicated device such as a ProTrieve sheath is unavailable, in patients with a suitably sized IVC.

Who should care

Cardiothoracic & Vascular SurgeryVascular Surgery

Limitations

Single case with no comparison, no long-term follow-up reported and an off-label device combination. Generalizability and safety cannot be judged.

Hypothesis-generating technical report; the approach may be considered only where alternatives are unavailable and anatomy is suitable.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

A 55-year-old Chinese male with anti-phospholipid syndrome presented with left lower limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on warfarin and had an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) implanted before a radical resection of a perineal sarcoma. The inferior vena cava (IVC) filter removal was attempted 2 weeks after the surgery, but thrombus was found at the filter. It was decided to leave the filter and to continue with anticoagulation. He presented with progressive right lower limb swelling, erythema and pain, with a CT venogram showing caval thrombosis extending from the IVC filter to the right below-knee veins. In view of worsening symptoms, endovenous mechanical thrombectomy of the IVC and iliofemoral veins, as well as caval filter removal, was performed using the ClotTriever and FlowTriever devices (Inari Medical, US). The ClotTriever itself was then placed alongside a 16Fr internal jugular vein (IJV) sheath to remove the thrombosed filter. The FlowTriever disc was next deployed from jugular access as proximal embolic protection during the thrombectomy procedure. The procedure was successful with no symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE). This report illustrates the alternative use of the ClotTriever BOLD as an intra-operative proximal embolic protection in the absence of alternative devices like a ProTrieve sheath, during caval thrombectomy and removal for caval thrombosis secondary to an IVC filter.Clinical ImpactThe ClotTriever BOLD catheter, deployed alongside a large retrograde sheath may be considered as an proximal embolic protection for removing thrombosed IVCFs, where there is patient with a suitably sized IVC and when alternative and appropriate devices are unavailable.

DOI

10.1177/15266028261497455

PMID

42888959

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in