International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
October 17, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Duration of a vaginal birth after cesarean section depending on the degree of cervical dilation in the prior cesarean delivery: A retrospective study.
Mawas N, Köninger A, Rauh M, Abou Tabikh I, Kappelmeyer M, Schnabel A.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
In women with one prior cesarean, a more advanced cervical dilation in that cesarean was associated with shorter labor in a subsequent VBAC.
What was studied
Retrospective study of 200 women in Regensburg, Germany (2018-2022) in trial of labor after cesarean, grouped by elective cesarean or cesarean in first or second stage.
Key findings
- VBAC succeeded in 75.5% (151/200); 24.5% had repeat cesarean
- Median labor duration was 12.2 h after elective cesarean, 10.0 h after first-stage and 8.0 h after second-stage cesarean
- Those with prior second-stage cesarean delivered about 4 h faster than the elective group
Clinical relevance
May help counseling about expected labor length in TOLAC.
Who should care
Limitations
Retrospective and single center; statistical tests are described only as t-test and correlation, with no adjustment for confounders; the abstract gives no p-values.
Advanced dilation in a prior cesarean seems to shorten subsequent VBAC labor.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Labor and birth lead to significant immunological and regenerative changes in the uterus, such that multiparous women typically experience faster and more effective labor than primiparous women. In this retrospective study, we examined the influence of labor activity and childbirth progress in the previous pregnancy on the duration of vaginal delivery of a second child in women with a history of one cesarean section. A total of 200 women bearing their second child with a trial of labor after cesarean who presented for delivery between January 2018 and December 2022 at the Clinic St. Hedwig (a tertiary maternity hospital of University of Regensburg, Germany) were included. Three subgroups were analyzed: women with a history of elective cesarean section, those with a history of cesarean section during the first stage of labor, and those with a history of cesarean section during the second stage of labor. The two stages were defined depending on the cervical dilation (first stage <10 cm, second stage: full dilatation). The duration of labor was defined as time between regular contractions or time of rupture of the membranes (whatever was first) to childbirth. A t-test and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted (using SigmaPlot 14.0). In 75.5% of cases (151/200), a vaginal birth (VBAC, vaginal birth after cesarean section) was achieved, and in 24.5% of cases (49/200), an unplanned repeat cesarean section was performed. The median duration of labor for VBAC in women with a history of elective cesarean was 12.2 h (interquartile range [IQR] 6.9-19.5), for those with a history of cesarean during the first stage of labor 10.0 h (IQR 6.0-16.2), and for those with a history of cesarean during the second stage of labor 8.0 h (IQR 3.9-12.0). Women with a history of cesarean during the second stage of labor deliver 4 h faster than women with a history of elective cesarean. Even if labor must be terminated during the first stage, an advanced degree of cervical dilation has a shortening effect on the duration of a subsequent VBAC.
DOI
10.1002/ijgo.71360
PMID
42891503
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed