Back to research feed

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

October 19, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Antimicrobial Resistance and One Health: Lessons on One Health Governance and Implementation from the Fleming Fund.

Abbas SS, Maudling R, Andremont A, +36 more, Zaheer MU

Journal ArticleAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Experience from 25 countries suggests One Health in AMR programs works best as a flexible approach to problem framing, backed by real investment beyond human health.

What was studied

Reflective paper on the Fleming Fund's design and implementation of One Health AMR programs in 25 countries, aimed at practical lessons for future One Health programs.

Key findings

  • One Health should be treated as an approach to problem framing and action rather than a program output, with flexibility for national adaptation
  • Sustained investment in animal and environmental sectors is needed to avoid symbolic engagement
  • The costs of multisectoral coordination should be explicitly resourced, and both formal governance and informal professional networks are essential

Clinical relevance

Useful for planners of AMR, emerging infectious disease and health security programs who need to build multisectoral collaboration and translate data into policy-relevant action.

Who should care

Infectious Disease

Limitations

A reflective, experience-based paper with no quantitative data or formal evaluation reported in the abstract.

Effective One Health implementation needs adaptable framing, resourced coordination and joint interpretation of evidence across sectors.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

This paper reflects upon the experience of the Fleming Fund in designing and implementing One Health antimicrobial resistance (AMR) programs in 25 countries and identifies practical lessons for the design of future One Health programs. The Fleming Fund experience highlights key priorities for implementing One Health effectively within AMR programs-though many of the insights should be applicable to other contexts as well, such as emerging infectious diseases and health security. One Health should be treated as an approach to problem framing and action rather than a program output, with flexibility for national adaptation. Meaningful implementation requires sustained investment beyond human health, particularly in animal and environmental sectors, to avoid symbolic engagement. Surveillance systems should consider both the role of the sector and sector-specific needs, supported by capacity for joint interpretation and use of evidence. The costs of multisectoral coordination should be explicitly resourced and both formal governance mechanisms and informal professional networks recognized as essential for building trust, sustaining collaboration, and translating data into policy-relevant action.

DOI

10.1093/cid/ciag517

PMID

42895837

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in