Stroke
October 15, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Health Literacy and Communication in Stroke Prevention, Management, and Recovery: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
Mogos MF, Maynard S, Perrin S, +7 more, American Heart Association Council Stroke and Neurovascular Nursing Science Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; and Stroke Council.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
This AHA scientific statement argues that health literacy and communication are central, often overlooked, determinants of stroke outcomes and identifies nurse-led and interprofessional strategies.
What was studied
Scientific statement synthesizing evidence on health literacy and communication across stroke prevention, management and recovery, with emphasis on nurse-led interventions, equity, and emerging technology.
Key findings
- Nurse-led interventions such as teach-back education, dyadic psychoeducation and tailored digital support improved stroke knowledge, self-efficacy, quality of life and caregiver preparedness
- Mismatches are greatest in patients with cognitive or language impairment, limited English proficiency, socioeconomic disadvantage or limited digital literacy
- The literature is heterogeneous, with many underpowered studies that rarely use validated health literacy measures
Clinical relevance
Teams can build in plain-language, culturally responsive communication, teach-back and standardized literacy assessment across stroke pathways, including for caregivers.
Who should care
Limitations
The statement acknowledges weak, heterogeneous evidence, and the abstract provides no quantitative effect sizes. Recommendations on AI and telehealth are prospective and require rigorous evaluation.
Better health literacy support is a shared, equity-relevant priority in stroke care, though the evidence base needs strengthening.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Health literacy is a critical component of high-quality stroke care. Across the continuum from prevention through recovery, health literacy is strongly associated with functional outcomes and stroke-related morbidity. Despite its importance, it is often overlooked, leaving patients and caregivers overwhelmed by communication demands that exceed their capacity. These mismatches are especially pronounced among individuals with stroke-related cognitive or language impairments, limited English proficiency, socioeconomic disadvantage, or limited digital literacy. This scientific statement synthesizes current evidence on the role of health literacy and communication within stroke systems of care and identifies nurse-led opportunities to advance equity and patient-centered outcomes while recognizing this as a shared interprofessional responsibility. Nurse-led interventions, including teach-back-based education, dyadic psychoeducational programs, and tailored digital support, have demonstrated improvements in stroke knowledge, self-efficacy, quality of life, and caregiver preparedness. However, the literature is marked by methodological heterogeneity. Many studies are underpowered and infrequently use validated health literacy or communication measures. Future directions include standardized assessment of health literacy; literacy-sensitive, nurse-led, and interprofessional care models; workforce training in plain-language and culturally responsive communication; and organizational health literacy principles. Emerging technologies, including telehealth and artificial intelligence, offer promise for improving communication and personalization but require rigorous evaluation to minimize bias and ensure equity and usability.
DOI
10.1161/str.0000000000000537
PMID
42877955
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed