Journal of cutaneous pathology
October 11, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Unmasking Iododerma: A Distinctive Histopathologic Pattern of Neutrophil-Rich Dermatosis With Haloed Cryptococcoid Bodies in the Setting of Hydralazine Exposure and Autoimmune Serologic Abnormalities.
Lenskaya V, Ciurea AM, Tabata M, John TM, Cho WC.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
Two women with kidney disease and hydralazine exposure developed iododerma after iodinated contrast, with a distinctive neutrophil-rich pattern and haloed cryptococcoid bodies.
What was studied
Case series of two women with chronic kidney disease and recent contrast exposure who developed bullous, erosive, retiform eruptions, evaluated by histopathology, infectious workup and serologies.
Key findings
- Histology showed a neutrophil-rich dermal infiltrate with haloed cryptococcoid bodies and vasculitis with fibrinoid necrosis; fungal, bacterial and acid-fast stains were negative
- Serum and urine iodine levels were markedly elevated
- Both patients had multiple autoantibody abnormalities and improved after corticosteroid therapy, iodine clearance and hydralazine discontinuation
Clinical relevance
Clinicians should consider iododerma in patients with renal impairment who develop a neutrophilic eruption after contrast, as it can mimic infection or vasculitis.
Who should care
Limitations
Two cases; the role of hydralazine is uncertain and the serologic abnormalities were interpreted cautiously.
Haloed cryptococcoid bodies in a neutrophil-rich infiltrate are a clue to iododerma.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Cutaneous iododerma is a rare adverse reaction to iodine-containing compounds that may clinically and histopathologically mimic infection, vasculitis, malignancy, and other neutrophilic dermatoses. Although most commonly associated with iodinated contrast exposure, a variety of predisposing factors and potential associations have been reported, including impaired renal function, repeated iodine exposure, and more recently, hydralazine therapy in isolated cases. We report two women with chronic kidney disease and recent iodinated contrast exposure who developed rapidly progressive, painful, bullous, erosive, and retiform eruptions after contrast administration. Both patients had concurrent hydralazine exposure. Initial clinical considerations included deep fungal infection, ecthyma, Sweet syndrome, drug eruption, and vasculitis. Histopathologic examination demonstrated a neutrophil-rich dermal infiltrate with numerous basophilic haloed cryptococcoid bodies and vasculitis with fibrinoid necrosis. Fungal, bacterial, and acid-fast stains were negative, and extensive infectious evaluations were unrevealing. Markedly elevated serum and urine iodine levels supported the diagnosis of iododerma. Both patients exhibited multiple immunologic abnormalities, including positivity or elevated levels of p-ANCA and antinuclear, anti-histone, anti-myeloperoxidase, and anti-proteinase 3 antibodies. These findings were interpreted cautiously given concurrent hydralazine exposure, the absence of definitive systemic autoimmune vasculitis, and the potential for reactive serologic abnormalities in the setting of intense neutrophilic inflammation. Both patients improved following corticosteroid therapy, iodine clearance, and discontinuation of hydralazine. These cases emphasize the diagnostic importance of recognizing haloed cryptococcoid bodies within a neutrophil-rich infiltrate associated with vasculitic injury as part of the histopathologic spectrum of iododerma. The significance of hydralazine exposure in the pathogenesis of iododerma remains uncertain and warrants further investigation.
DOI
10.1111/cup.70234
PMID
42860326
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed