Back to research feed

Insights into imaging

October 13, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Reproducibility and diagnostic performance of ADC for assessing response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-ROI comparison analysis from the phase-Ib NABUCCO trial.

Greidanus J, Bernabei C, Chupetvloska K, +8 more, Trebeschi S.

Journal ArticleOpen access

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

Muscle-normalised ADC was not a usable biomarker overall: the most reproducible measurement was not predictive, and the most predictive was not reproducible.

What was studied

Analysis of MRI data from 35 patients in the Phase-Ib NABUCCO trial of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer; three radiologists measured ADC in several regions of interest on pre- and post-treatment scans, assessing inter-observer agreement, prediction of pathological complete response (pCR), muscle normalisation and correlation with cell density from multiplex immunofluorescence.

Key findings

  • Whole-tumour ROI ADC had the highest reproducibility (0.98, 95% CI 0.95-0.99) but no predictive value (AUC = 0.31)
  • The most hypointense ROI predicted pCR best (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI 0.57-1, p = 0.025) but with limited reproducibility; the baseline-to-follow-up change in this region also reached AUC = 0.80 (p = 0.015)
  • Muscle normalisation did not improve prediction and occasionally lowered reproducibility
  • No significant correlation between whole-tumour ADC and cell density

Clinical relevance

Quantitative ADC cannot yet guide bladder-preserving strategies after immunotherapy; standardised or AI-assisted ROI segmentation may be needed first.

Who should care

Radiodiagnosis/Radiology

Limitations

Small cohort within a phase-Ib trial, subsets of only 20-25 patients per ROI analysis, wide confidence intervals, and no external validation.

ADC shows promise but no tested approach was both reproducible and predictive, so robust standardised biomarkers are still needed.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Objective

MRI is increasingly used to assess treatment response in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but only qualitatively. This study evaluates the reproducibility and predictive value of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), thought to be a non-invasive surrogate for tumor cell density, in patients with MIBC receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Materials and methods

MRI data from 35 patients, enrolled in the Phase-Ib NABUCCO trial, were analyzed. ADC maps were derived from pre- and post-treatment MRI scans. Three independent radiologists assessed multiple regions of interest (ROIs) to evaluate inter-observer agreement and predictive performance for pathological complete response (pCR). ADC values were normalized using muscle tissue as a reference. Additionally, we analyzed the correlation between ADC and cell densities, derived from multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) data.

Results

ADC measurements from the whole-tumor ROI (n = 25) demonstrated the highest reproducibility (0.98, 95% CI = [0.95-0.99]), but lacked predictive value (AUC = 0.31, 95% CI = [0.12-0.53], p = 0.109). The most hypointense ROI (n = 22) showed the strongest predictive value for pCR (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI = [0.57-1], p = 0.025), though with limited reproducibility. The difference between baseline and follow-up ADC values in the hypointense region (n = 20) again showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI = [0.58-0.98], p = 0.015). Although muscle normalization is proposed to reduce scanner variability, it did not improve predictive performance in this cohort and occasionally reduced reproducibility. No significant correlation was found between whole-tumor ADC and cell density.

Conclusion

Despite analyzing different measurement techniques for ADC values, none was simultaneously reproducible and predictive, nor provided insights into the biology of the tumor. While ADC shows promise in MIBC, there is an urgent need for more standardized, robust imaging biomarkers.

Key points

Question Non-invasive biomarkers are urgently needed to guide bladder-preserving strategies in MIBC. Findings DWI-MRI shows promise, but standardized robust imaging biomarkers are essential for reliable response assessment. Critical relevance statement Standardized or AI-assisted ROI segmentation could improve ADC reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy in multicenter studies.

DOI

10.1186/s13244-026-02397-z

PMID

42870138

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in