Back to research feed

Pediatrics

October 13, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Association of Caregiver Mental Health and a Childhood Parenting Intervention in China.

Jiang Q, Qian Y, Wang B, Rozelle S, Fernald L.

Journal ArticleAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

A parenting program in rural China improved cognitive and language development mainly among children whose caregivers had no baseline mental health symptoms.

What was studied

A cluster randomized trial across 100 rural villages with 2,554 caregiver-child dyads (children 6 to 24 months), randomizing villages to weekly 1-on-1 parenting sessions or comparison, with 2,044 completing endline at 1 year and testing whether caregiver depression, anxiety and stress moderated effects.

Key findings

  • Among children of caregivers without depressive symptoms, cognitive development improved by 0.17 SD and language by 0.10 SD
  • Cognitive effects were also seen with low anxiety (0.13 SD) or low stress (0.15 SD)
  • No significant effects were detected among children whose caregivers had mental health symptoms
  • Differences were driven by stimulating parenting practices rather than attendance or beliefs

Clinical relevance

Parenting programs may need to screen for and address caregiver mental health to reach children whose caregivers are struggling.

Who should care

Pediatrics

Limitations

Moderator analyses were secondary and the setting was rural China, limiting generalization. Some effect intervals were borderline (lower bounds of 0.00).

Caregiver mental health appears to moderate parenting intervention benefits, so combined supports may be needed.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Objectives

This study examines whether and how caregiver mental health symptoms influence the impacts of a center-based parenting intervention on child development.

Methods

We conducted a clustered randomized controlled trial across 100 rural villages in China between 2016 and 2019. Villages were randomly assigned to a treatment group that received weekly 1-on-1 parenting sessions through parenting centers or to a pure comparison group. A total of 2554 caregiver-child dyads with children aged 6 to 24 months were surveyed at baseline, and 2044 completed the endline survey after 1 year (follow-up rate: 80.0%). Child development was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition. Caregiver mental health was measured using the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21. Ordinary least squares regressions with interaction terms were used for analysis.

Results

The intervention significantly improved cognitive (β = 0.17 SD; 95% CI 0.045-0.29) and language development (β = 0.10 SD; 95% CI 0.00-0.21) among children whose caregivers did not exhibit depressive symptoms at baseline. Positive cognitive effects were also observed among children of caregivers with low anxiety (β = 0.13 SD; 95% CI 0.00-0.26) or low stress (β = 0.15 SD; 95% CI 0.03-0.27). In contrast, no significant effects were detected across developmental domains among children whose caregivers exhibited mental health symptoms. Heterogeneous impacts were driven by differences in stimulating parenting practices rather than program attendance or parenting beliefs.

Conclusions

The intervention primarily benefited children whose caregivers had no baseline mental health symptoms, suggesting caregiver mental health moderates intervention effects.

DOI

10.1542/peds.2026-076649

PMID

42863843

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in