Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia
September 22, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Pain trajectories during the waiting period for elective lumbar spine Surgery: A prospective cohort study from an Australian public tertiary centre.
Singhal S, Stone C, Walkley E, Hannan R, Hayasaka S, M Y Quan G.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
Back pain stayed stable for most patients waiting six months for elective lumbar spine surgery.
What was studied
Prospective cohort of 40 consecutive patients at an Australian public tertiary centre with pain and SF-36 follow-up.
Key findings
- 70% had no meaningful pain change.
- 15% improved and 15% worsened.
- No SF-36 score changed significantly.
Clinical relevance
The wait does not usually worsen pain on average, but individuals vary.
Who should care
Limitations
Small single-centre cohort with limited power to detect individual trajectories.
Reassess patients who worsen while waiting rather than assuming deterioration for all.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
The natural history of back pain in patients awaiting elective lumbar spine surgery within a public healthcare system remains incompletely characterised. Understanding how pain evolves over the preoperative waiting period is relevant for resource allocation and the targeting of preoperative interventions. This prospective single-centre cohort study examined back pain trajectories over a six-month waiting period in 40 consecutive patients (mean age 64.7 years; 42.5% male) listed for elective lumbar spine surgery at an Australian public tertiary orthopaedic unit between October 2022 and October 2024. Pain severity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale across motion, standing, and sitting domains and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey at recruitment and at six months. Paired analysis demonstrated no statistically or clinically significant change in mean VAS scores across any domain, with mean changes of approximately 0.2 points in all domains and the composite (all p > 0.5). Using a 2-point minimum clinically important difference threshold, 70% of patients (28/40) had no meaningful change, 15% (6/40) improved, and 15% (6/40) worsened. SF-36 results triangulated this finding: no subscale or component summary score showed a statistically significant change over six months. These findings indicate that, contrary to the prevailing assumption, mean preoperative pain remains stable for most patients during a six-month wait, and extend recent international evidence to the Australian public-system context. Larger cohorts will be required to further characterise the observed heterogeneity in individual patient trajectories.
DOI
10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112309
PMID
42815217
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed