Fertility and sterility
October 19, 2026 · via Europe PMC
Strategy-Based Comparison of Fresh Double Embryo Transfer Versus Sequential Single Embryo Transfers in Women With Adequate Blastocyst Availability.
Weng TH, Lee CC, Lee KS, Chiu CS, Kuo-Kuang Lee R, Lin MH.
AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only
Sequential single embryo transfers gave higher cumulative pregnancy and live birth than fresh double transfer.
What was studied
Retrospective single-centre study of 256 women under 40: 135 sequential SET and 121 fresh DET.
Key findings
- Cumulative clinical pregnancy was 86.7% vs 61.2%.
- Cumulative live birth was 63.7% vs 51.2% (RR 1.24).
- Initial pregnancy rate was lower with SET.
Clinical relevance
Supports elective single embryo transfer with frozen follow-up.
Who should care
Limitations
Retrospective; the SET group was younger, so confounding likely.
Prefer sequential SET when multiple good blastocysts exist.
This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.
Abstract
Objective
To compare the cumulative reproductive outcomes of two embryo transfer strategies in women with adequate blastocyst availability: immediate fresh double embryo transfer (DET) and a sequential strategy consisting of fresh single embryo transfer (SET) followed by frozen-thawed SET derived from the same retrieval cohort.
Design
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Taipei MacKay Memorial Hospital using clinical data from January 2017 to December 2023.
Setting
A single tertiary reproductive center.
Subjects
Women younger than 40 years with normal ovarian reserve and ≥ two good-quality blastocysts obtained from a single stimulation cycle.
Exposure
Patients underwent either fresh DET or sequential SET that included a second transfer within three years.
Main outcome measures
Cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CCPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per retrieval cycle.
Results
A total of 256 patients were included: 135 in the sequential SET group (33.39 ± 3.13 years) and 121 in the fresh DET group (35.41 ± 2.87 years). The CCPR was significantly higher in the sequential SET group than in the fresh DET group (86.7% vs.61.2%; RR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.21-1.66), as was the CLBR (63.7% vs.51.2%; RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00-1.54). Although the initial pregnancy rate was lower in the group who would have sequential SET than fresh DET (41.4% vs.61.2%), cumulative pregnancy outcomes improved substantially after the second transfer in the SET cohort. The miscarriage rate did not differ significantly between the sequential SET and fresh DET groups (24.7% vs. 14.9%; RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.89-3.13), whereas the twin pregnancy rate was markedly lower (0% vs.14.9%, p < 0.001) in the sequential SET group. Based on pooled neonatal data irrespective of plurality, mean gestational age (38.47 vs.37.41 weeks, p = 0.69) and mean birth weight (3065 vs.2773 g, p = 0.09) were comparable between groups. Preterm births per oocyte retrieval cycle were significantly less frequent following sequential SET than fresh DET (2 vs.16, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Among patients with favorable embryo availability, sequential SET demonstrated higher cumulative reproductive outcomes within a strategy-based framework than fresh DET. These findings reflect differences in embryo utilization pathways rather than in isolated transfer efficacy; they should be interpreted in the context of treatment continuation and cohort selection.
DOI
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2026.10.013
PMID
42896753
Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.
Want more like this?
Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.
Back to the research feed