Back to research feed

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation

June 25, 2026 · via Europe PMC

Metabolic Acidosis and Progression of CKD: Current Guidelines and Considerations.

Beynon-Cobb B, Visser W, Hoorn EJ, Morris A.

ReviewAbstract only — full text under license

AI summary — for doctors, generated from the abstract only

The authors argue KDIGO's practice points on metabolic acidosis in CKD, with a bicarbonate cutoff below 18 mmol/L, leave many patients untreated and should be revised.

What was studied

Critical appraisal of the KDIGO guidance and the placebo-controlled trials it cites regarding treating metabolic acidosis to slow CKD progression.

Key findings

  • KDIGO issued practice points, not recommendations, suggesting treatment when bicarbonate is below 18 mmol/L.
  • This threshold may leave a substantial number of people with CKD acidosis untreated.
  • The authors believe cited evidence could be interpreted differently and propose a research agenda.

Clinical relevance

Nephrologists must decide when to treat low bicarbonate, and the debate affects thresholds and alkali therapy.

Who should care

Nephrology

Limitations

This is an opinion-based appraisal rather than new data, and the abstract gives no quantitative reanalysis.

Use clinical judgment on alkali therapy for bicarbonate in the mildly low range, recognizing that guidance is contested.

This is an AI-generated summary of the published abstract, not a clinical recommendation. It may not reflect the full text or subsequent updates — verify against the original source before acting on it.

Abstract

Observational evidence suggests that metabolic acidosis in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a driver of CKD progression, but there remains significant debate regarding the quantity and quality of published evidence to support treatment. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidance on metabolic acidosis in CKD highlighted this controversy by publishing practice points, not recommendations, based primarily on placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials. These practice points suggest considering treatment to prevent metabolic acidosis with a proposed cutoff for serum bicarbonate < 18 mmol/L. However, this approach means a substantial number of individuals with CKD may now remain untreated for their metabolic acidosis, which may impact CKD progression with associated adverse health outcomes. Additionally, the guidance does not include all the available evidence. From our critical appraisal we suggest that the evidence cited could have been interpreted differently. We recommend that the practice points published are revised based on critical appraisal of the cited evidence to inform the clinical management of individuals with metabolic acidosis in CKD. We also suggest a research agenda for future studies to help resolve this issue.

DOI

10.1053/j.ajkd.2026.03.047

PMID

42349771

Research metadata (titles, abstracts, authors, publication dates) is sourced from Europe PMC, which aggregates content from PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and other providers under the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM/NCBI). NLM does not claim copyright on abstracts; the original journal publishers or authors may hold rights to the full articles. AI-generated summaries are derived only from the abstract, never the full text, and are always labeled as AI-generated.

Want more like this?

Browse more from the feed. A free account unlocks the full feed, saving and communities.

Back to the research feed

Create a free account · Sign in